Analyzing the Variability of Subjective Image Quality Ratings for Different Distortions

Olga Cherepkova, S. A. Amirshahi, Marius Pedersen
{"title":"Analyzing the Variability of Subjective Image Quality Ratings for Different Distortions","authors":"Olga Cherepkova, S. A. Amirshahi, Marius Pedersen","doi":"10.1109/IPTA54936.2022.9784120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When it comes to evaluating the quality of images, individual observers show different opinions depending on the type of distortion affecting the quality of the image. While in the opinion of one observer a distortion could have a dramatic influence on the quality of the image, another observer could see the same distortion as not having an important effect on the quality of the same image. Using a subjective experiment, we aim to identify the distortions which show the largest variability among observers. For this, 22 observers evaluated the quality of 10 reference images and the 630 test images created from them (21 distortions at three levels). Our results show that the highest variability in subjective scores is linked to distortions like saturation, contrast, sharpness, quantization, some types of added noise, and radial lens distortion.","PeriodicalId":381729,"journal":{"name":"2022 Eleventh International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Eleventh International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPTA54936.2022.9784120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When it comes to evaluating the quality of images, individual observers show different opinions depending on the type of distortion affecting the quality of the image. While in the opinion of one observer a distortion could have a dramatic influence on the quality of the image, another observer could see the same distortion as not having an important effect on the quality of the same image. Using a subjective experiment, we aim to identify the distortions which show the largest variability among observers. For this, 22 observers evaluated the quality of 10 reference images and the 630 test images created from them (21 distortions at three levels). Our results show that the highest variability in subjective scores is linked to distortions like saturation, contrast, sharpness, quantization, some types of added noise, and radial lens distortion.
分析不同失真情况下主观图像质量评分的可变性
当谈到评价图像质量时,不同的观察者会根据影响图像质量的失真类型表现出不同的观点。虽然在一个观察者看来,一种扭曲可能对图像的质量产生巨大影响,但另一个观察者可能认为,同样的扭曲对同一图像的质量没有重大影响。使用主观实验,我们的目标是确定在观察者之间显示最大变异性的扭曲。为此,22名观察员评估了10个参考图像和630个测试图像的质量(21个三级失真)。我们的研究结果表明,主观评分的最高可变性与饱和度、对比度、清晰度、量化、某些类型的附加噪声和径向透镜畸变等失真有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信