Prediction of Deformation Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steel 304 in Dynamic Strain Aging Regime

N. Krishnamurthy, Y. Singh, A. Gupta, Swadesh Kumar Singh
{"title":"Prediction of Deformation Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steel 304 in Dynamic Strain Aging Regime","authors":"N. Krishnamurthy, Y. Singh, A. Gupta, Swadesh Kumar Singh","doi":"10.11127/IJAMMC.2013.02.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main focus of this paper is prediction of flow stress of Austenitic Stainless Steel 304 in the Dynamic Strain Aging (DSA) regime. For this purpose, a comparative study has been made on the capability of modified Zerilli Armstrong (ZA) model and the Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) model for representing the flow stress prediction in the DSA Regime. The DSA regime was identified by observing the serrations in the plot between true stress and true strain.The modified-ZA equation for prediction of flow behavior at elevated temperature of the material considers isotropic hardening, temperature softening, strain rate hardening, and the coupled effects of temperature and strain and of strain rate and temperature on the flow stress. Artificial Neural Network is another powerful tool to predict the flow stress behavior which uses a part of the data to train the network while the other is used to validate the model. Suitability of these models was evaluated by comparing the correlation coefficient and absolute average error of prediction. It was observed that the flow stress predictions of ZA model were not as accurate as compared to predictions of ANN model. The resultant value of the correlation coefficient for ZA Model was 0.8889 and that of ANN’s tested data was 0.9990.","PeriodicalId":207087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Materials Manufacturing and Characterization","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Materials Manufacturing and Characterization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11127/IJAMMC.2013.02.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The main focus of this paper is prediction of flow stress of Austenitic Stainless Steel 304 in the Dynamic Strain Aging (DSA) regime. For this purpose, a comparative study has been made on the capability of modified Zerilli Armstrong (ZA) model and the Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) model for representing the flow stress prediction in the DSA Regime. The DSA regime was identified by observing the serrations in the plot between true stress and true strain.The modified-ZA equation for prediction of flow behavior at elevated temperature of the material considers isotropic hardening, temperature softening, strain rate hardening, and the coupled effects of temperature and strain and of strain rate and temperature on the flow stress. Artificial Neural Network is another powerful tool to predict the flow stress behavior which uses a part of the data to train the network while the other is used to validate the model. Suitability of these models was evaluated by comparing the correlation coefficient and absolute average error of prediction. It was observed that the flow stress predictions of ZA model were not as accurate as compared to predictions of ANN model. The resultant value of the correlation coefficient for ZA Model was 0.8889 and that of ANN’s tested data was 0.9990.
304奥氏体不锈钢动态应变时效变形行为的预测
本文主要研究了304奥氏体不锈钢在动态应变时效(DSA)状态下的流变应力预测。为此,对比研究了修正Zerilli Armstrong (ZA)模型和人工神经网络(ANN)模型在DSA状态下表示流动应力预测的能力。通过观察真实应力和真实应变之间的锯齿来确定DSA状态。预测材料高温下流动行为的修正za方程考虑了各向同性硬化、温度软化、应变速率硬化以及温度与应变、应变速率与温度对流动应力的耦合效应。人工神经网络是另一种预测流动应力行为的强大工具,它使用一部分数据来训练网络,另一部分数据用于验证模型。通过比较预测的相关系数和绝对平均误差来评价模型的适用性。结果表明,与ANN模型相比,ZA模型的流变应力预测精度较低。ZA模型的相关系数结果值为0.8889,ANN的检验数据的相关系数结果值为0.9990。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信