Validating Wikis (and other Collaborative Writing Tools)

P. Bernick, J. Palazzolo
{"title":"Validating Wikis (and other Collaborative Writing Tools)","authors":"P. Bernick, J. Palazzolo","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2007.4464094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though a person with a shovel may dig a hole in an hour, the same hole couldn't be achieved in a minute by giving 60 shovels to 60 people. For some, good solutions don't involve throwing more people at a task. Contrast this with Linus's Law, first coined by Eric Raymond, which claims that \"with many eyes, the bugs are few\". The claim is supported by the successful collaborative development model and robustness of the Linux operating system. In the past, typewriters and word processors might have been the equivalent of digital shovels. But several new collaborative authoring tools create new opportunities for adding eyes to the construction of documents. To avoid creating a new technology myth by suggesting that these tools will solve all of the problems associated with collaborative authoring (and without creating new ones), this paper explores some of these tools. We identify some of their strengths and weaknesses, look at how some are using them, and suggest some tasks for which each tool seems well suited.","PeriodicalId":348807,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2007.4464094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Though a person with a shovel may dig a hole in an hour, the same hole couldn't be achieved in a minute by giving 60 shovels to 60 people. For some, good solutions don't involve throwing more people at a task. Contrast this with Linus's Law, first coined by Eric Raymond, which claims that "with many eyes, the bugs are few". The claim is supported by the successful collaborative development model and robustness of the Linux operating system. In the past, typewriters and word processors might have been the equivalent of digital shovels. But several new collaborative authoring tools create new opportunities for adding eyes to the construction of documents. To avoid creating a new technology myth by suggesting that these tools will solve all of the problems associated with collaborative authoring (and without creating new ones), this paper explores some of these tools. We identify some of their strengths and weaknesses, look at how some are using them, and suggest some tasks for which each tool seems well suited.
验证wiki(和其他协作写作工具)
虽然一个人用一把铲子可以在一个小时内挖一个洞,但如果给60个人60把铲子,在一分钟内挖不完同样的洞。对一些人来说,好的解决方案不需要把更多的人投入到一项任务中。与此形成对比的是埃里克•雷蒙德(Eric Raymond)首创的莱纳斯定律(Linus’s Law),该定律声称“眼睛多,bug少”。这种说法得到了成功的协作开发模型和Linux操作系统健壮性的支持。在过去,打字机和文字处理器可能相当于数字铲子。但是,一些新的协作创作工具创造了新的机会,可以为文档的构建添加眼睛。为了避免通过暗示这些工具将解决与协作创作相关的所有问题(并且不会产生新的问题)来创造一个新的技术神话,本文探讨了其中的一些工具。我们确定了它们的一些优点和缺点,看看其中一些是如何使用它们的,并建议每个工具似乎都非常适合的一些任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书