The Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in Corporate Governance: A Comment on Strine

Stephen M. Bainbridge
{"title":"The Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in Corporate Governance: A Comment on Strine","authors":"Stephen M. Bainbridge","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.985683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his essay, Toward Common Sense and Common Ground?, Delaware Vice Chancellor Leo Strine seeks to identify common concerns of corporate management, labor, and shareholders. In so doing, Strine endorses a vision of the corporation as \"a social institution that, albeit having the ultimate goal of producing profits for stockholders, also durably serves and exemplifies other societal values.\" Accordingly, he directs our attention to the prospects of creating \"a corporate governance structure that better fosters [the corporation's stakeholders'] mutual interest in sustainable economic growth.\" There is much that is admirable in Strine's analysis of what ails corporate governance and his proposals for reform, as well as much that is debatable. In this brief comment, I identify three aspects of Strine's analysis that strike me as underdeveloped. First, what do we mean when we call the corporation \"a social institution\"? Second, do managers and laborers really have common interests threatened by shareholders? Finally, even if Strine's search for common ground is a worthwhile project, is corporate law and governance the appropriate arena in which to find it? Taken together, these issues raise serious questions about the viability of Strine's project.","PeriodicalId":106641,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate & Takeover Law","volume":"469 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate & Takeover Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.985683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In his essay, Toward Common Sense and Common Ground?, Delaware Vice Chancellor Leo Strine seeks to identify common concerns of corporate management, labor, and shareholders. In so doing, Strine endorses a vision of the corporation as "a social institution that, albeit having the ultimate goal of producing profits for stockholders, also durably serves and exemplifies other societal values." Accordingly, he directs our attention to the prospects of creating "a corporate governance structure that better fosters [the corporation's stakeholders'] mutual interest in sustainable economic growth." There is much that is admirable in Strine's analysis of what ails corporate governance and his proposals for reform, as well as much that is debatable. In this brief comment, I identify three aspects of Strine's analysis that strike me as underdeveloped. First, what do we mean when we call the corporation "a social institution"? Second, do managers and laborers really have common interests threatened by shareholders? Finally, even if Strine's search for common ground is a worthwhile project, is corporate law and governance the appropriate arena in which to find it? Taken together, these issues raise serious questions about the viability of Strine's project.
公司治理中管理者与劳动者的利益共享:Strine评论
在他的文章《走向常识和共同点?》特拉华州副校长Leo Strine试图找出公司管理层、劳工和股东共同关心的问题。在这样做的过程中,Strine赞同将公司视为“一个社会机构,尽管其最终目标是为股东创造利润,但也会持久地服务并体现其他社会价值观。”因此,他将我们的注意力引向创造“一个更好地促进(公司利益相关者)在可持续经济增长中的共同利益的公司治理结构”的前景。Strine对公司治理问题的分析和他的改革建议中有很多令人钦佩的地方,也有很多值得商榷的地方。在这篇简短的评论中,我认为Strine的分析有三个方面欠发达。首先,当我们称公司为“社会机构”时,我们指的是什么?第二,管理者和劳动者真的有共同利益受到股东的威胁吗?最后,即使Strine寻找共同点是一个有价值的项目,公司法和公司治理是寻找共同点的合适领域吗?综上所述,这些问题对Strine项目的可行性提出了严重的质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信