Cleanroom, PSP, and the Software Development Impact Statement: Developing the Right Attitude

Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training Pub Date : 1999-03-22 DOI:10.1109/CSEET.1999.10008

D. Gotterbarn

{"title":"Cleanroom, PSP, and the Software Development Impact Statement: Developing the Right Attitude","authors":"D. Gotterbarn","doi":"10.1109/CSEET.1999.10008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional distinction between education as something which is done at a university and training as something which is done by industry, is not only incorrect but the focus on this distinction leads us to ignore more critical issues in the development of competent software engineers. The adequacy and success of a variety of delivery techniques for the education and training of software engineers are discussed using three software development tools as examples. From this foundation, I argue that our traditional understanding of training is too limited and must be modified to develop software engineers who are competent to meet the changing needs of their employers and their profession. The traditional distinction between education as something which is done at university and training as something which is done by industry is not only an incorrect distinction but the focus on this distinction leads us to ignore more critical issues in the development of competent software engineers. The adequacy and success of a variety of delivery techniques for the education and training of software engineers are discussed using three software development tools as examples. From this foundation, I argue that our traditional understanding of training is too limited and must be modified to develop software engineers who are competent to meet the changing needs of their employers and their profession","PeriodicalId":250569,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training","volume":"274 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.1999.10008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

The traditional distinction between education as something which is done at a university and training as something which is done by industry, is not only incorrect but the focus on this distinction leads us to ignore more critical issues in the development of competent software engineers. The adequacy and success of a variety of delivery techniques for the education and training of software engineers are discussed using three software development tools as examples. From this foundation, I argue that our traditional understanding of training is too limited and must be modified to develop software engineers who are competent to meet the changing needs of their employers and their profession. The traditional distinction between education as something which is done at university and training as something which is done by industry is not only an incorrect distinction but the focus on this distinction leads us to ignore more critical issues in the development of competent software engineers. The adequacy and success of a variety of delivery techniques for the education and training of software engineers are discussed using three software development tools as examples. From this foundation, I argue that our traditional understanding of training is too limited and must be modified to develop software engineers who are competent to meet the changing needs of their employers and their profession

查看原文本刊更多论文

洁净室、PSP和软件开发影响声明:培养正确的态度

传统上认为教育是在大学里完成的事情，而培训是在行业里完成的事情，这种区分不仅是不正确的，而且对这种区分的关注导致我们忽视了培养合格软件工程师的更关键的问题。本文以三种软件开发工具为例，讨论了用于软件工程师教育和培训的各种交付技术的充分性和成功性。在此基础上，我认为我们对培训的传统理解太过有限，必须进行修改，以培养能够满足雇主和专业不断变化的需求的软件工程师。传统上认为教育是在大学里完成的事情，而培训是在行业里完成的事情，这不仅是一种不正确的区分，而且对这种区分的关注导致我们忽视了培养合格软件工程师的更关键的问题。本文以三种软件开发工具为例，讨论了用于软件工程师教育和培训的各种交付技术的充分性和成功性。在此基础上，我认为我们对培训的传统理解太过有限，必须进行修改，以培养能够满足雇主和专业不断变化的需求的软件工程师

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training

自引率

0.00%

发文量