Data Driven Model Identification for a Chaotic Pendulum With Variable Interaction Potential

Melih C. Yesilli, Firas A. Khasawneh
{"title":"Data Driven Model Identification for a Chaotic Pendulum With Variable Interaction Potential","authors":"Melih C. Yesilli, Firas A. Khasawneh","doi":"10.1115/detc2020-22597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Data driven model identification methods have grown increasingly popular due to enhancements in measuring devices and data mining. They provide a useful approach for comparing the performance of a device to the simplified model that was used in the design phase. One of the modern, popular methods for model identification is Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy). Although this approach has been widely investigated in the literature using mostly numerical models, its applicability and performance with physical systems is still a topic of current research. In this paper we extend SINDy to identify the mathematical model of a complicated physical experiment of a chaotic pendulum with a varying potential interaction. We also test the approach using a simulated model of a nonlinear, simple pendulum. The input to the approach is a time series, and estimates of its derivatives. While the standard approach in SINDy is to use the Total Variation Regularization (TVR) for derivative estimates, we show some caveats for using this route, and we benchmark the performance of TVR against other methods for derivative estimation. Our results show that the estimated model coefficients and their resulting fit are sensitive to the selection of the TVR parameters, and that most of the available derivative estimation methods are easier to tune than TVR. We also highlight other guidelines for utilizing SINDy to avoid overfitting, and we point out that the fitted model may not yield accurate results over long time scales. We test the performance of each method for noisy data sets and provide both experimental and simulation results. We also post the files needed to build and reproduce our experiment in a public repository.","PeriodicalId":236538,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: 16th International Conference on Multibody Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Control (MSNDC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: 16th International Conference on Multibody Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Control (MSNDC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2020-22597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data driven model identification methods have grown increasingly popular due to enhancements in measuring devices and data mining. They provide a useful approach for comparing the performance of a device to the simplified model that was used in the design phase. One of the modern, popular methods for model identification is Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy). Although this approach has been widely investigated in the literature using mostly numerical models, its applicability and performance with physical systems is still a topic of current research. In this paper we extend SINDy to identify the mathematical model of a complicated physical experiment of a chaotic pendulum with a varying potential interaction. We also test the approach using a simulated model of a nonlinear, simple pendulum. The input to the approach is a time series, and estimates of its derivatives. While the standard approach in SINDy is to use the Total Variation Regularization (TVR) for derivative estimates, we show some caveats for using this route, and we benchmark the performance of TVR against other methods for derivative estimation. Our results show that the estimated model coefficients and their resulting fit are sensitive to the selection of the TVR parameters, and that most of the available derivative estimation methods are easier to tune than TVR. We also highlight other guidelines for utilizing SINDy to avoid overfitting, and we point out that the fitted model may not yield accurate results over long time scales. We test the performance of each method for noisy data sets and provide both experimental and simulation results. We also post the files needed to build and reproduce our experiment in a public repository.
变相互作用势混沌摆的数据驱动模型辨识
由于测量设备和数据挖掘的改进,数据驱动模型识别方法越来越受欢迎。它们提供了一种有用的方法,可以将设备的性能与设计阶段使用的简化模型进行比较。非线性动力学稀疏辨识(SINDy)是目前比较流行的模型辨识方法之一。虽然这种方法在文献中已经被广泛研究,主要使用数值模型,但其在物理系统中的适用性和性能仍然是当前研究的主题。本文将SINDy推广到具有变势相互作用的混沌摆复杂物理实验的数学模型。我们还使用一个非线性单摆的模拟模型来测试该方法。该方法的输入是一个时间序列及其导数的估计。虽然SINDy中的标准方法是使用总变差正则化(TVR)进行导数估计,但我们显示了使用该路线的一些注意事项,并且我们将TVR的性能与其他导数估计方法进行了基准测试。结果表明,估计的模型系数及其拟合结果对TVR参数的选择很敏感,并且大多数可用的导数估计方法比TVR更容易调整。我们还强调了利用SINDy避免过拟合的其他指导方针,并指出拟合的模型在长时间尺度上可能无法产生准确的结果。我们测试了每种方法在噪声数据集上的性能,并提供了实验和仿真结果。我们还在公共存储库中发布构建和复制实验所需的文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信