{"title":"The Journalist Who Interpreted Too Much: The New York Times’ Courtship, Defense, and Betrayal of John W. White","authors":"Kevin L Stoker","doi":"10.1177/1522637917719276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the behind-the-scenes correspondence, from 1928 to 1941, between the New York Times’ news executives and editors and John W. White, who served as the paper’s first Chief South American Correspondent. An analysis of the correspondence and White’s dispatches shows that interactions between news management, foreign governments, and the U.S. State Department influenced White’s writing to the point that he avoided writing about Argentina’s neighbors; provided more positive, “Pollyanna” material; and censored his own dispatches. The study provides further evidence that Arthur Hays Sulzberger meddled in the paper’s news coverage, even before he became Times publisher in 1935. The correspondence between Sulzberger and White also calls into question the romantic myth of the autonomous foreign correspondent, free to report without fear or favor. Instead, it shows that American foreign correspondents faced scrutiny not only from their news executives and editors but also from foreign governments, police officials, local newspapers, Nazi and Fascist spies, U.S. business interests, the State Department, and even the President of the United States.","PeriodicalId":147592,"journal":{"name":"Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1522637917719276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This study analyzes the behind-the-scenes correspondence, from 1928 to 1941, between the New York Times’ news executives and editors and John W. White, who served as the paper’s first Chief South American Correspondent. An analysis of the correspondence and White’s dispatches shows that interactions between news management, foreign governments, and the U.S. State Department influenced White’s writing to the point that he avoided writing about Argentina’s neighbors; provided more positive, “Pollyanna” material; and censored his own dispatches. The study provides further evidence that Arthur Hays Sulzberger meddled in the paper’s news coverage, even before he became Times publisher in 1935. The correspondence between Sulzberger and White also calls into question the romantic myth of the autonomous foreign correspondent, free to report without fear or favor. Instead, it shows that American foreign correspondents faced scrutiny not only from their news executives and editors but also from foreign governments, police officials, local newspapers, Nazi and Fascist spies, U.S. business interests, the State Department, and even the President of the United States.
本研究分析了1928年至1941年间,《纽约时报》新闻主管和编辑与《纽约时报》首任首席南美记者约翰·w·怀特(John W. White)之间的幕后通信。对这些信件和怀特的电报的分析表明,新闻管理部门、外国政府和美国国务院之间的互动影响了怀特的写作,以至于他避免写有关阿根廷邻国的文章;提供更多积极的、“盲目乐观”的材料;并审查自己的报道。这项研究提供了进一步的证据,证明阿瑟·海斯·苏兹伯格(Arthur Hays Sulzberger)甚至在1935年成为《纽约时报》出版人之前就干预了该报的新闻报道。苏兹伯格和怀特之间的通信也让人们对独立的驻外记者的浪漫神话产生了质疑,他们可以不受恐惧和偏袒地自由报道。相反,它表明,美国驻外记者不仅面临来自新闻主管和编辑的审查,还面临来自外国政府、警察官员、当地报纸、纳粹和法西斯间谍、美国商业利益集团、国务院,甚至美国总统的审查。