Socio-environmental comparison in indigenous agricultural productive systems: Tontotuna, Totoró-Colombia and Tsotsil, Chamula-Mexico

Martha Lucía Ordóñez Serna, Olga Lucía Sanabria Diago
{"title":"Socio-environmental comparison in indigenous agricultural productive systems: Tontotuna, Totoró-Colombia and Tsotsil, Chamula-Mexico","authors":"Martha Lucía Ordóñez Serna, Olga Lucía Sanabria Diago","doi":"10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200146r2vu2022l2oa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A comparison of the conservation practices associated with the management of the family agricultural production system called the Trau Misak garden and the Patchocona garden is presented. in the indigenous peoples of the Tontotuna Reservation, Municipality of Totoró-Cauca-Colombia and the Tsotsil people, Municipality of Chamula-Chiapas-México, respectively. The methodology was framed in hermeneutics and was based on ethnobotany, interrelating the axes of time, space and culture. Given the holistic and complex nature of this research, ethnography and participatory action research were used with descriptive techniques for the dynamics of use and management of plant resources in Trau Misak and Patchocona’. The results present the comparative transformation strategies that are generated and used in Trau Misak and Patchocona ‘, strengthening the identity of each indigenous people, facing the problems of survival and contributing to the reduction of hunger, by laying the foundations for food security.","PeriodicalId":261125,"journal":{"name":"Ambiente & Sociedade","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambiente & Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200146r2vu2022l2oa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract A comparison of the conservation practices associated with the management of the family agricultural production system called the Trau Misak garden and the Patchocona garden is presented. in the indigenous peoples of the Tontotuna Reservation, Municipality of Totoró-Cauca-Colombia and the Tsotsil people, Municipality of Chamula-Chiapas-México, respectively. The methodology was framed in hermeneutics and was based on ethnobotany, interrelating the axes of time, space and culture. Given the holistic and complex nature of this research, ethnography and participatory action research were used with descriptive techniques for the dynamics of use and management of plant resources in Trau Misak and Patchocona’. The results present the comparative transformation strategies that are generated and used in Trau Misak and Patchocona ‘, strengthening the identity of each indigenous people, facing the problems of survival and contributing to the reduction of hunger, by laying the foundations for food security.
土著农业生产系统的社会环境比较:Tontotuna, Totoró-Colombia和Tsotsil, Chamula-Mexico
摘要:比较了与家庭农业生产系统管理相关的保护实践,称为Trau Misak花园和Patchocona花园。分别是Totoró-Cauca-Colombia市通托图纳保留地土著人民和查穆拉-恰帕斯-姆萨伊科市Tsotsil人民。该方法以解释学为框架,以民族植物学为基础,将时间、空间和文化的轴线相互联系起来。考虑到这项研究的整体性和复杂性,人种学和参与性行动研究与描述技术一起用于Trau Misak和Patchocona植物资源的使用和管理动态。结果展示了在特劳米萨克和帕乔科纳产生和使用的比较转型战略,通过为粮食安全奠定基础,加强了每个土著人民的身份,面对生存问题并有助于减少饥饿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信