Identifying Redundant Constraints for AC OPF: The Challenges of Local Solutions, Relaxation Tightness, and Approximation Inaccuracy

A. O. Aquino, Line A. Roald, D. Molzahn
{"title":"Identifying Redundant Constraints for AC OPF: The Challenges of Local Solutions, Relaxation Tightness, and Approximation Inaccuracy","authors":"A. O. Aquino, Line A. Roald, D. Molzahn","doi":"10.1109/NAPS52732.2021.9654442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To compute reliable and low-cost operating points, electric power system operators solve optimization problems that enforce inequality constraints such as limits on line flows, voltage magnitudes, and generator outputs. A common empirical observation regarding these constraints is that only a small fraction of them are binding (satisfied with equality) during operation. Furthermore, the same constraints tend to be binding across time periods. Recent research efforts have developed constraint screening algorithms that formalize this observation and allow for screening across operational conditions that are representative of longer time periods. These algorithms identify redundant constraints, i.e., constraints that can never be violated if other constraints are satisfied, by solving optimization problems for each constraint separately. This paper investigates how the choice of power flow formulation, represented either by the non-convex AC power flow, convex relaxations, or a linear DC approximation, impacts the results and the computational time of the screening method. This allows us to characterize the conservativeness of convex relaxations in constraint screening and assess the efficacy of the DC approximation in this context.","PeriodicalId":123077,"journal":{"name":"2021 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS52732.2021.9654442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

To compute reliable and low-cost operating points, electric power system operators solve optimization problems that enforce inequality constraints such as limits on line flows, voltage magnitudes, and generator outputs. A common empirical observation regarding these constraints is that only a small fraction of them are binding (satisfied with equality) during operation. Furthermore, the same constraints tend to be binding across time periods. Recent research efforts have developed constraint screening algorithms that formalize this observation and allow for screening across operational conditions that are representative of longer time periods. These algorithms identify redundant constraints, i.e., constraints that can never be violated if other constraints are satisfied, by solving optimization problems for each constraint separately. This paper investigates how the choice of power flow formulation, represented either by the non-convex AC power flow, convex relaxations, or a linear DC approximation, impacts the results and the computational time of the screening method. This allows us to characterize the conservativeness of convex relaxations in constraint screening and assess the efficacy of the DC approximation in this context.
识别AC OPF的冗余约束:局部解、松弛紧性和逼近不准确性的挑战
为了计算可靠和低成本的工作点,电力系统运营商解决了优化问题,这些问题强制执行不等式约束,如对线路流量、电压大小和发电机输出的限制。关于这些约束的一个常见的经验观察是,在操作过程中,只有一小部分约束是有约束力的(满足相等)。此外,相同的约束往往在不同的时间段具有约束力。最近的研究工作已经开发出约束筛选算法,将这种观察形式化,并允许在具有较长时间代表性的操作条件下进行筛选。这些算法通过分别求解每个约束的优化问题来识别冗余约束,即在满足其他约束的情况下永远不会被违反的约束。本文研究了以非凸交流潮流、凸松弛或线性直流近似表示的潮流公式的选择如何影响筛选方法的结果和计算时间。这使我们能够表征约束筛选中凸松弛的保守性,并评估在这种情况下DC近似的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信