The empirical evidence for the social-ecological impacts of seaweed farming

Scott Spillias, R. Kelly, Richard S. Cottrell, K. O’Brien, R. Im, Ji Yoon Kim, Chuan Lei, Rainbow W. S. Leung, Misako Matsuba, Juliana Albano Reis, Yoichi Sato, K. Sempert, E. McDonald‐Madden
{"title":"The empirical evidence for the social-ecological impacts of seaweed farming","authors":"Scott Spillias, R. Kelly, Richard S. Cottrell, K. O’Brien, R. Im, Ji Yoon Kim, Chuan Lei, Rainbow W. S. Leung, Misako Matsuba, Juliana Albano Reis, Yoichi Sato, K. Sempert, E. McDonald‐Madden","doi":"10.1371/journal.pstr.0000042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seaweed farming is widely expected to transform the way we approach sustainable developments, particularly in the context of the ‘Blue Economy’. However, many claims of the social and ecological benefits from seaweed farming have limited or contextually weak empirical grounding. Here we systematically review relevant publications across four languages to form a comprehensive picture of observed—rather than theorised—social and environmental impacts of seaweed farming globally. We show that, while some impacts such as improved water quality and coastal livelihoods are consistently reported, other promulgated benefits vary across cultivation contexts or are empirically unsubstantiated. For some communities, increasing dependence on seaweed farming may improve or worsen the cultural fabric and their vulnerability to economic and environmental shocks. The empirical evidence for the impacts of seaweed farming is also restricted geographically, mainly to East Asia and South-East Asia, and taxonomically. Seaweed farming holds strong potential to contribute to sustainability objectives, but the social and ecological risks associated with scaling up global production remain only superficially understood. These risks require greater attention to ensure just, equitable, and sustainable seaweed industries can be realised.","PeriodicalId":384293,"journal":{"name":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Seaweed farming is widely expected to transform the way we approach sustainable developments, particularly in the context of the ‘Blue Economy’. However, many claims of the social and ecological benefits from seaweed farming have limited or contextually weak empirical grounding. Here we systematically review relevant publications across four languages to form a comprehensive picture of observed—rather than theorised—social and environmental impacts of seaweed farming globally. We show that, while some impacts such as improved water quality and coastal livelihoods are consistently reported, other promulgated benefits vary across cultivation contexts or are empirically unsubstantiated. For some communities, increasing dependence on seaweed farming may improve or worsen the cultural fabric and their vulnerability to economic and environmental shocks. The empirical evidence for the impacts of seaweed farming is also restricted geographically, mainly to East Asia and South-East Asia, and taxonomically. Seaweed farming holds strong potential to contribute to sustainability objectives, but the social and ecological risks associated with scaling up global production remain only superficially understood. These risks require greater attention to ensure just, equitable, and sustainable seaweed industries can be realised.
海藻养殖对社会生态影响的实证研究
人们普遍预计,海藻养殖将改变我们实现可持续发展的方式,特别是在“蓝色经济”的背景下。然而,许多声称海藻养殖的社会和生态效益有限或背景薄弱的经验基础。在这里,我们系统地回顾了四种语言的相关出版物,以形成一个全面的全球海藻养殖观察到的社会和环境影响的图片,而不是理论。我们表明,虽然一些影响,如改善水质和沿海生计的报道是一致的,但其他公布的好处因种植环境而异,或者没有经验证实。对一些社区来说,日益依赖海藻养殖可能改善或恶化其文化结构及其对经济和环境冲击的脆弱性。海藻养殖影响的经验证据在地理上和分类学上也受到限制,主要局限于东亚和东南亚。海藻养殖具有促进可持续发展目标的巨大潜力,但与扩大全球生产相关的社会和生态风险仍然只是肤浅的认识。这些风险需要更多的关注,以确保实现公正、公平和可持续的海藻产业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信