Is There an Actual Need of Registration? Reflections on Free Formality Principle

E. Ikonomi
{"title":"Is There an Actual Need of Registration? Reflections on Free Formality Principle","authors":"E. Ikonomi","doi":"10.4236/blr.2020.114053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Free Formality Principle, as a fundamental principle of Berne Convention, since its introduction has been a commodity for the protection of the works of the Union, and same time a strong obstacle for other countries to join the Convention, because of their strict and mandatory registration system. In consideration of changes, digitalization, and all different possibilities of creating, sharing and infringing works, this paper aims to highlight the need of registration of the works. By comparing and analyzing the domestic laws of two countries: Albania and U.S., both part of Berne Convention, the paper will precisely point out the differences not only in their ways of requiring registration of the works, but also in the specific effects they create. The paper will put forth some of the benefits of copyright registration and will try to explain that encouraging registration is actually not a burden, but an opportunity to provide a “healthy situation” with mutual benefits, both for copyright holders and public interest. The paper suggests introducing incentives to the registration system, which can preserve FFP, but also can make copyright holders feel interested to register their works.","PeriodicalId":300394,"journal":{"name":"Beijing Law Review","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beijing Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2020.114053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Free Formality Principle, as a fundamental principle of Berne Convention, since its introduction has been a commodity for the protection of the works of the Union, and same time a strong obstacle for other countries to join the Convention, because of their strict and mandatory registration system. In consideration of changes, digitalization, and all different possibilities of creating, sharing and infringing works, this paper aims to highlight the need of registration of the works. By comparing and analyzing the domestic laws of two countries: Albania and U.S., both part of Berne Convention, the paper will precisely point out the differences not only in their ways of requiring registration of the works, but also in the specific effects they create. The paper will put forth some of the benefits of copyright registration and will try to explain that encouraging registration is actually not a burden, but an opportunity to provide a “healthy situation” with mutual benefits, both for copyright holders and public interest. The paper suggests introducing incentives to the registration system, which can preserve FFP, but also can make copyright holders feel interested to register their works.
是否真的需要注册?对自由形式原则的思考
形式自由原则作为《伯尔尼公约》的一项基本原则,自问世以来一直是本联盟保护作品的商品,同时由于其严格的强制性注册制度,成为其他国家加入《伯尔尼公约》的强大障碍。考虑到变化、数字化以及创作、分享和侵权作品的各种可能性,本文旨在强调作品注册的必要性。通过对阿尔巴尼亚和美国这两个《伯尔尼公约》成员国国内法的比较和分析,本文将准确地指出它们不仅在要求作品注册的方式上存在差异,而且在它们所产生的具体效果上也存在差异。本文将提出版权登记的一些好处,并试图解释鼓励登记实际上不是一种负担,而是一个机会,为版权持有人和公众利益提供一个互利的“健康状况”。本文建议在注册制度中引入激励机制,既可以保护FFP,又可以使版权所有者有兴趣注册他们的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信