What can we learn from natural and artificial dependency trees

M. Courtin, Chunxiao Yan
{"title":"What can we learn from natural and artificial dependency trees","authors":"M. Courtin, Chunxiao Yan","doi":"10.18653/v1/W19-7915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is centered around two main contributions : the first one consists in introducing several procedures for generating random dependency trees with constraints; we later use these artificial trees to compare their properties with the properties of natural trees (i.e trees extracted from treebanks) and analyze the relationships between these properties in natural and artificial settings in order to find out which relationships are formally constrained and which are linguistically motivated. We take into consideration five metrics: tree length, height, maximum arity, mean dependency distance and mean flux weight, and also look into the distribution of local configurations of nodes. This analysis is based on UD treebanks (version 2.3, Nivre et al. 2018) for four languages: Chinese, English, French and Ja-panese.","PeriodicalId":196648,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First Workshop on Quantitative Syntax (Quasy, SyntaxFest 2019)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First Workshop on Quantitative Syntax (Quasy, SyntaxFest 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-7915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper is centered around two main contributions : the first one consists in introducing several procedures for generating random dependency trees with constraints; we later use these artificial trees to compare their properties with the properties of natural trees (i.e trees extracted from treebanks) and analyze the relationships between these properties in natural and artificial settings in order to find out which relationships are formally constrained and which are linguistically motivated. We take into consideration five metrics: tree length, height, maximum arity, mean dependency distance and mean flux weight, and also look into the distribution of local configurations of nodes. This analysis is based on UD treebanks (version 2.3, Nivre et al. 2018) for four languages: Chinese, English, French and Ja-panese.
我们可以从自然依赖树和人工依赖树中学到什么
本文主要围绕两个方面做出贡献:第一个是介绍了几个生成带有约束的随机依赖树的过程;我们随后使用这些人造树将它们的属性与自然树(即从树库中提取的树)的属性进行比较,并分析这些属性在自然和人工设置下的关系,以找出哪些关系是形式约束的,哪些是语言动机的。我们考虑了5个指标:树长、树高、树最大密度、平均依赖距离和平均通量权重,并研究了节点的局部配置分布。该分析基于四种语言的UD树库(版本2.3,Nivre等人,2018):中文、英文、法文和日文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信