V. I. Lamansky and the origins of “russian byzantism”

A. Malinov
{"title":"V. I. Lamansky and the origins of “russian byzantism”","authors":"A. Malinov","doi":"10.15382/sturi2022100.67-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the attitude of the largest Russian Slavist Vladimir Ivanovich Lamansky (1833-1914) to the history and cultural heritage of Byzantium. It is noted that although the term \"Byzantism\" characterises the philosophical-historical doctrine of K.N. Leontiev, a number of statements developed in K.N. Leontiev's concept were expressed earlier by V.I. Lamansky. It is suggested that Lamansky had an influence on Leontiev's views, especially on Byzantium. The development of Lamansky's views on Byzantium from his first monograph \"On the Slavs in Asia Minor, Africa and Spain\" up to his last unfinished book \"The Slavonic Hagiography of St. Cyril as a Religious Epic and a Historical Source\" is shown. The article points out the similarity between V.I. Lamansky's doctrine on the difference of ages of peoples and cultures and the organiccist conceptions of N.Y. Danilevsky and K.N. Leontiev. Lamansky's interpretation of the mutual relations between Slavs and Greeks, and the relationship between Slavs and the Eastern Roman Empire is considered. It is noted that the main influence of Byzantium was connected to the development of state conceptions of the Slavs and acceptance of Orthodoxy. The special significance of Orthodoxy lay in the recognition of the rights of national languages (divine service in native languages and the development of writing systems), which led to a better acquaintance of Orthodox peoples with Christian doctrine. V.I. Lamansky's opinion on the causes of the fall of the Eastern Roman Empire is given: oblivion of the universal meaning of Christianity, Hellenization, and spread of nationalism. V. I. Lamansky's understanding of the meaning of the empire, i.e. the united Christian kingdom which Russia is heir to, is revealed. The article concludes that Lamansky's interest in the study of Byzantium resulted from his own historiosophic doctrine of three civilizational worlds (Romano-Germanic, Greek-Slavic and Asian).","PeriodicalId":170812,"journal":{"name":"St.Tikhons' University Review","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St.Tikhons' University Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturi2022100.67-87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the attitude of the largest Russian Slavist Vladimir Ivanovich Lamansky (1833-1914) to the history and cultural heritage of Byzantium. It is noted that although the term "Byzantism" characterises the philosophical-historical doctrine of K.N. Leontiev, a number of statements developed in K.N. Leontiev's concept were expressed earlier by V.I. Lamansky. It is suggested that Lamansky had an influence on Leontiev's views, especially on Byzantium. The development of Lamansky's views on Byzantium from his first monograph "On the Slavs in Asia Minor, Africa and Spain" up to his last unfinished book "The Slavonic Hagiography of St. Cyril as a Religious Epic and a Historical Source" is shown. The article points out the similarity between V.I. Lamansky's doctrine on the difference of ages of peoples and cultures and the organiccist conceptions of N.Y. Danilevsky and K.N. Leontiev. Lamansky's interpretation of the mutual relations between Slavs and Greeks, and the relationship between Slavs and the Eastern Roman Empire is considered. It is noted that the main influence of Byzantium was connected to the development of state conceptions of the Slavs and acceptance of Orthodoxy. The special significance of Orthodoxy lay in the recognition of the rights of national languages (divine service in native languages and the development of writing systems), which led to a better acquaintance of Orthodox peoples with Christian doctrine. V.I. Lamansky's opinion on the causes of the fall of the Eastern Roman Empire is given: oblivion of the universal meaning of Christianity, Hellenization, and spread of nationalism. V. I. Lamansky's understanding of the meaning of the empire, i.e. the united Christian kingdom which Russia is heir to, is revealed. The article concludes that Lamansky's interest in the study of Byzantium resulted from his own historiosophic doctrine of three civilizational worlds (Romano-Germanic, Greek-Slavic and Asian).
V. I. Lamansky和“俄罗斯拜占庭主义”的起源
本文论述了俄罗斯最大的斯拉夫主义者弗拉基米尔·伊万诺维奇·拉曼斯基(Vladimir Ivanovich Lamansky, 1833-1914)对拜占庭历史和文化遗产的态度。值得注意的是,虽然“拜占庭主义”一词是列昂蒂耶夫哲学历史学说的特征,但列昂蒂耶夫概念中发展起来的一些陈述早在拉曼斯基之前就已经表达过了。有人认为,拉曼斯基对列昂捷夫的观点,特别是对拜占庭的观点产生了影响。拉曼斯基关于拜占庭的观点从他的第一部专著《论小亚细亚、非洲和西班牙的斯拉夫人》到他最后一部未完成的书《作为宗教史诗和历史来源的圣西里尔斯拉夫圣徒传》的发展。本文指出拉曼斯基关于民族和文化年龄差异的学说与丹尼列夫斯基和列昂捷耶夫的有机论观念有相似之处。拉曼斯基对斯拉夫人与希腊人之间相互关系的解释,以及斯拉夫人与东罗马帝国之间的关系。值得注意的是,拜占庭的主要影响与斯拉夫人国家观念的发展和对东正教的接受有关。东正教的特殊意义在于承认民族语言的权利(用母语祈祷和书写系统的发展),这使得东正教民族更好地了解基督教教义。拉曼斯基对东罗马帝国灭亡的原因的看法是:基督教普遍意义的遗忘、希腊化和民族主义的蔓延。V. I. Lamansky对帝国(即俄罗斯继承的联合基督教王国)含义的理解被揭示出来。文章的结论是,拉曼斯基对拜占庭研究的兴趣源于他自己关于三个文明世界(罗马-日耳曼、希腊-斯拉夫和亚洲)的历史哲学学说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信