Boundary Blurring as Collective Identity Formation? The Case of the Left-wing Islamists in Turkey

Mustafa Yavaş
{"title":"Boundary Blurring as Collective Identity Formation? The Case of the Left-wing Islamists in Turkey","authors":"Mustafa Yavaş","doi":"10.1108/s0163-786x20190000043011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do heretical social movements build and negotiate their collective identities? This chapter tackles this question by examining the case of an emerging social movement, the left-wing Islamists in contemporary Turkey, that cuts across the durable divide between Turkey’s left and Islam. Drawing on four months of fieldwork in Turkey, I argue that, in addition to activating the typical “us versus them” dynamic of contentious politics, the left-wing Islamists also rely on blurring the social and symbolic boundaries that govern political divides in the course of building their collective identities. Their social boundary blurring includes facilitating otherwise unlikely face-to-face conversations and mutual ties between leftists and Islamists and spearheading alliances on common grounds including anti-imperialism and labor. Their symbolic boundary blurring includes performing a synthesis of Islamist and leftist repertoires of contention and reframing Islamic discourse with a strong emphasis on social justice and oppositional fervor. The case of Turkey’s left-wing Islamists illuminates the process of boundary blurring as a key dimension of collective identity and alliance formation across divides.","PeriodicalId":314175,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s0163-786x20190000043011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do heretical social movements build and negotiate their collective identities? This chapter tackles this question by examining the case of an emerging social movement, the left-wing Islamists in contemporary Turkey, that cuts across the durable divide between Turkey’s left and Islam. Drawing on four months of fieldwork in Turkey, I argue that, in addition to activating the typical “us versus them” dynamic of contentious politics, the left-wing Islamists also rely on blurring the social and symbolic boundaries that govern political divides in the course of building their collective identities. Their social boundary blurring includes facilitating otherwise unlikely face-to-face conversations and mutual ties between leftists and Islamists and spearheading alliances on common grounds including anti-imperialism and labor. Their symbolic boundary blurring includes performing a synthesis of Islamist and leftist repertoires of contention and reframing Islamic discourse with a strong emphasis on social justice and oppositional fervor. The case of Turkey’s left-wing Islamists illuminates the process of boundary blurring as a key dimension of collective identity and alliance formation across divides.
边界模糊是集体身份的形成?土耳其左翼伊斯兰主义者的案例
异端社会运动是如何建立和协商他们的集体身份的?本章通过考察一个新兴的社会运动——当代土耳其的左翼伊斯兰主义者——来解决这个问题,该运动跨越了土耳其左翼和伊斯兰教之间的长期鸿沟。根据我在土耳其四个月的实地考察,我认为,除了在有争议的政治中激活典型的“我们对他们”的动态之外,左翼伊斯兰主义者还依赖于模糊社会和象征界限,这些界限在建立他们的集体身份的过程中支配着政治分歧。他们的社会界限模糊包括促进左派和伊斯兰主义者之间不太可能的面对面对话和相互联系,以及在包括反帝国主义和劳工在内的共同基础上领导联盟。他们的象征性边界模糊包括对伊斯兰主义者和左派的争论进行综合,并以强烈强调社会正义和反对热情的方式重新构建伊斯兰话语。土耳其左翼伊斯兰主义者的案例说明,边界模糊的过程是集体认同和跨界联盟形成的关键维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信