Money and Output: The Missing Links: A Time Series Analysis

A. Faure
{"title":"Money and Output: The Missing Links: A Time Series Analysis","authors":"A. Faure","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2275852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an immense body of literature on the relationship of money and output, with result-integrity depending on the aggregates used. This paper proposes an alternative two-step approach, based on the reality that: (1) money creation is just the outcome of new bank loans extended, and (2) the (net) new demand for bank loans, when satisfied by the banking sector, parallels the growth in nominal GDP in the long-term – because, mainly, economic units borrow to consume (C) or invest (I), the major contributors to nominal GDP. The new deposits created are M1 deposits, but they can swiftly shift to M2-M1 or M3-M2, reflecting portfolio – or “demand for money” – decisions. Therefore, mining for an association between M1 and real GDP growth is not fruitful. The direct link between the monetary and real sectors lies is the association of new net bank loans to the private sector (the outcome of which is money creation) with nominal GDP growth: the R2 of the South African data (no massaging; quarterly; 1965-2012) is 0.99. The relationship in the short-term is less well correlated. The long- and short-term associations must be a fully considered Step 1, because it contains the seeds of the answer to Step 2: the translation of nominal GDP growth into real GDP growth and inflation, that is, the trade-off between these related aggregates. This article offers a time series analysis of Step 1, based on South African data.","PeriodicalId":111923,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Monetary Policy (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Monetary Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2275852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

There is an immense body of literature on the relationship of money and output, with result-integrity depending on the aggregates used. This paper proposes an alternative two-step approach, based on the reality that: (1) money creation is just the outcome of new bank loans extended, and (2) the (net) new demand for bank loans, when satisfied by the banking sector, parallels the growth in nominal GDP in the long-term – because, mainly, economic units borrow to consume (C) or invest (I), the major contributors to nominal GDP. The new deposits created are M1 deposits, but they can swiftly shift to M2-M1 or M3-M2, reflecting portfolio – or “demand for money” – decisions. Therefore, mining for an association between M1 and real GDP growth is not fruitful. The direct link between the monetary and real sectors lies is the association of new net bank loans to the private sector (the outcome of which is money creation) with nominal GDP growth: the R2 of the South African data (no massaging; quarterly; 1965-2012) is 0.99. The relationship in the short-term is less well correlated. The long- and short-term associations must be a fully considered Step 1, because it contains the seeds of the answer to Step 2: the translation of nominal GDP growth into real GDP growth and inflation, that is, the trade-off between these related aggregates. This article offers a time series analysis of Step 1, based on South African data.
货币与产出:缺失环节:时间序列分析
关于货币与产出的关系,有大量的文献,其结果的完整性取决于所使用的总量。本文基于以下现实提出了另一种两步法:(1)货币创造只是新增银行贷款的结果,(2)银行贷款的(净)新需求,当银行部门满足时,与长期名义GDP的增长平行——因为,主要是经济单位借贷消费(C)或投资(I),名义GDP的主要贡献者。新创造的存款是M1存款,但它们可以迅速转变为M2-M1或M3-M2,这反映了投资组合(或“货币需求”)的决定。因此,挖掘M1和实际GDP增长之间的联系是没有成果的。货币部门与实体部门之间的直接联系在于,私人部门新增净银行贷款(其结果是货币创造)与名义GDP增长之间存在关联:南非数据的R2(没有篡改;季度;1965-2012)为0.99。这种关系在短期内不太相关。第一步必须充分考虑长期和短期关联,因为它包含了第二步答案的种子:将名义GDP增长转化为实际GDP增长和通胀,即这些相关总量之间的权衡。本文基于南非的数据,对第1步进行了时间序列分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信