Perbandingan Perlakuan Akuntansi Aset Biologis Berdasarkan PSAK 16 dan PSAK 69 Pada Perusahaan Agrikultur

I Gusti Ketut Agung Ulupui, Argie Destri Rahmani, Dwi Handarini, Hafifah Nasution
{"title":"Perbandingan Perlakuan Akuntansi Aset Biologis Berdasarkan PSAK 16 dan PSAK 69 Pada Perusahaan Agrikultur","authors":"I Gusti Ketut Agung Ulupui, Argie Destri Rahmani, Dwi Handarini, Hafifah Nasution","doi":"10.29303/akurasi.v4i1.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to provide an overview of the differences in the accounting treatment of biological assets before and after the implementation of PSAK 69, namely based on PSAK 16 and PSAK 69. This study analyzed the implementation of PSAK 69 in agricultural companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2018. The data analysis technique used in this study is an interactive model analysis technique namely to know the difference in accounting treatment for biological assets based on PSAK 16 and PSAK 69 in 15 agricultural companies. The are three aspects in compared; first on the recognition aspect, based on PSAK 16, agricultural companies recognize plantation crops as assets and do not recognize agricultural products as biological assets. Meanwhile, PSAK 69 measures the biological assets of agricultural companies using fair value less costs to sell and biological assets are not depreciated. Based on PSAK 16, agricultural companies disclose matters related to depreciation.Meanwhile, based on PSAK 69, agricultural companies disclose descriptions of biological asset groups and the value of gain/ losses arising from the use of fair value. Based on the results of the analysis 3 of 15 agricultural companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2018 has implemented PSAK 69 as much as 100%, the rest apply PSAK 69 as much as 50% to 94%.","PeriodicalId":226028,"journal":{"name":"Akurasi : Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan","volume":"103 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akurasi : Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v4i1.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to provide an overview of the differences in the accounting treatment of biological assets before and after the implementation of PSAK 69, namely based on PSAK 16 and PSAK 69. This study analyzed the implementation of PSAK 69 in agricultural companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2018. The data analysis technique used in this study is an interactive model analysis technique namely to know the difference in accounting treatment for biological assets based on PSAK 16 and PSAK 69 in 15 agricultural companies. The are three aspects in compared; first on the recognition aspect, based on PSAK 16, agricultural companies recognize plantation crops as assets and do not recognize agricultural products as biological assets. Meanwhile, PSAK 69 measures the biological assets of agricultural companies using fair value less costs to sell and biological assets are not depreciated. Based on PSAK 16, agricultural companies disclose matters related to depreciation.Meanwhile, based on PSAK 69, agricultural companies disclose descriptions of biological asset groups and the value of gain/ losses arising from the use of fair value. Based on the results of the analysis 3 of 15 agricultural companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2018 has implemented PSAK 69 as much as 100%, the rest apply PSAK 69 as much as 50% to 94%.
基于农业公司PSAK 16和PSAK 69的生物资产会计处理比较
本研究旨在概述实施PSAK 69前后,即基于PSAK 16和PSAK 69的生物资产会计处理的差异。本研究分析了2017-2018年在印尼证券交易所上市的农业公司实施PSAK 69的情况。本研究使用的数据分析技术是一种交互式模型分析技术,即了解15家农业公司基于PSAK 16和PSAK 69的生物资产会计处理差异。从三个方面进行比较;首先在确认方面,基于PSAK 16,农业公司将种植作物确认为资产,不将农产品确认为生物资产。同时,PSAK 69采用公允价值减去出售成本的方法计量农业公司的生物资产,生物资产不计提折旧。农业企业根据PSAK 16披露折旧相关事项。同时,基于PSAK 69,农业公司披露了生物资产组的描述和使用公允价值产生的损益价值。根据对2018年期间在印度尼西亚证券交易所上市的15家农业公司的分析结果,其中3家公司实施PSAK 69的比例高达100%,其余公司实施PSAK 69的比例高达50%至94%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信