Deliberation, Tyranny, and Time in Early Caroline England

Todd Butler
{"title":"Deliberation, Tyranny, and Time in Early Caroline England","authors":"Todd Butler","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198844068.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores how, with growing royal demands for the expeditious provision of financial and military support, time increasingly became an index of power in Caroline England. It begins with how in 1625 and 1626 disputes over royal finances became increasingly subsumed into a structural conflict between king and the Commons over deliberative prerogatives. This political conflict is modeled in Philip Massinger’s The Roman Actor, which uses disputes over the temporal dimensions of political intellection to detail the limits of both theatrical efficacy and royal authority in Caroline England. The result is a play that rejects the immediacy of tyrannical authority in favor of a conceptualization of both theatrical and political power whose emphasis on delay yields a dynamic that is fundamentally collaborative rather than imperial.","PeriodicalId":235309,"journal":{"name":"Literature and Political Intellection in Early Stuart England","volume":"457 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literature and Political Intellection in Early Stuart England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198844068.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores how, with growing royal demands for the expeditious provision of financial and military support, time increasingly became an index of power in Caroline England. It begins with how in 1625 and 1626 disputes over royal finances became increasingly subsumed into a structural conflict between king and the Commons over deliberative prerogatives. This political conflict is modeled in Philip Massinger’s The Roman Actor, which uses disputes over the temporal dimensions of political intellection to detail the limits of both theatrical efficacy and royal authority in Caroline England. The result is a play that rejects the immediacy of tyrannical authority in favor of a conceptualization of both theatrical and political power whose emphasis on delay yields a dynamic that is fundamentally collaborative rather than imperial.
卡罗琳早期英格兰的深思熟虑、暴政与时间
这一章探讨了随着皇室对快速提供财政和军事支持的需求日益增长,时间如何日益成为卡罗琳英格兰的权力指标。从1625年到1626年,关于王室财政的争论逐渐演变为国王和下议院在审议权上的结构性冲突开始。菲利普·马辛格(Philip Massinger)的《罗马演员》(The Roman Actor)以这种政治冲突为模型,通过对政治思想的时间维度的争论,详细描述了卡罗琳·英格兰(Caroline England)戏剧效果和王室权威的局限性。其结果是,这部戏剧拒绝了暴虐权威的直接性,赞成戏剧和政治权力的概念化,这种权力强调延迟,产生了一种从根本上说是合作而不是帝国的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信