{"title":"Deliberation, Tyranny, and Time in Early Caroline England","authors":"Todd Butler","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198844068.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores how, with growing royal demands for the expeditious provision of financial and military support, time increasingly became an index of power in Caroline England. It begins with how in 1625 and 1626 disputes over royal finances became increasingly subsumed into a structural conflict between king and the Commons over deliberative prerogatives. This political conflict is modeled in Philip Massinger’s The Roman Actor, which uses disputes over the temporal dimensions of political intellection to detail the limits of both theatrical efficacy and royal authority in Caroline England. The result is a play that rejects the immediacy of tyrannical authority in favor of a conceptualization of both theatrical and political power whose emphasis on delay yields a dynamic that is fundamentally collaborative rather than imperial.","PeriodicalId":235309,"journal":{"name":"Literature and Political Intellection in Early Stuart England","volume":"457 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literature and Political Intellection in Early Stuart England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198844068.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter explores how, with growing royal demands for the expeditious provision of financial and military support, time increasingly became an index of power in Caroline England. It begins with how in 1625 and 1626 disputes over royal finances became increasingly subsumed into a structural conflict between king and the Commons over deliberative prerogatives. This political conflict is modeled in Philip Massinger’s The Roman Actor, which uses disputes over the temporal dimensions of political intellection to detail the limits of both theatrical efficacy and royal authority in Caroline England. The result is a play that rejects the immediacy of tyrannical authority in favor of a conceptualization of both theatrical and political power whose emphasis on delay yields a dynamic that is fundamentally collaborative rather than imperial.
这一章探讨了随着皇室对快速提供财政和军事支持的需求日益增长,时间如何日益成为卡罗琳英格兰的权力指标。从1625年到1626年,关于王室财政的争论逐渐演变为国王和下议院在审议权上的结构性冲突开始。菲利普·马辛格(Philip Massinger)的《罗马演员》(The Roman Actor)以这种政治冲突为模型,通过对政治思想的时间维度的争论,详细描述了卡罗琳·英格兰(Caroline England)戏剧效果和王室权威的局限性。其结果是,这部戏剧拒绝了暴虐权威的直接性,赞成戏剧和政治权力的概念化,这种权力强调延迟,产生了一种从根本上说是合作而不是帝国的动力。