Taking Responsibility

Elinor Mason
{"title":"Taking Responsibility","authors":"Elinor Mason","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198833604.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter introduces a third sort of blameworthiness, extended blameworthiness. The argument defends the idea that we can take responsibility. One kind of relevant case was discussed in Chapter 6: sometimes agents try hard, but because of their own bad motivations, do badly. This chapter returns to that case, and considers two other challenges: cases where an agent’s act or omission is bad but entirely inadvertent, and cases where an agent acts through implicit biases. In these cases, there is some pull to find the agent blameworthy. We can make sense of that by arguing that when certain sorts of relationship are at stake, agents should take responsibility for their failures and be willing to engage in the blame conversation. In taking responsibility they become properly blameworthy in the extended way.","PeriodicalId":359225,"journal":{"name":"Ways to be Blameworthy","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ways to be Blameworthy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833604.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter introduces a third sort of blameworthiness, extended blameworthiness. The argument defends the idea that we can take responsibility. One kind of relevant case was discussed in Chapter 6: sometimes agents try hard, but because of their own bad motivations, do badly. This chapter returns to that case, and considers two other challenges: cases where an agent’s act or omission is bad but entirely inadvertent, and cases where an agent acts through implicit biases. In these cases, there is some pull to find the agent blameworthy. We can make sense of that by arguing that when certain sorts of relationship are at stake, agents should take responsibility for their failures and be willing to engage in the blame conversation. In taking responsibility they become properly blameworthy in the extended way.
承担责任
本章介绍了第三种应受谴责,即延伸的应受谴责。这个论点支持我们可以承担责任的观点。第六章讨论了一类相关的案例:有时代理人很努力,但由于他们自己的不良动机,做得不好。这一章回到了那个案例,并考虑了另外两个挑战:一个是代理人的作为或不作为是坏的,但完全是无意的,另一个是代理人通过内隐偏见行事的情况。在这些情况下,有些人会认为代理人应该受到指责。我们可以这样理解:当某种关系处于危险之中时,行为者应该为自己的失败承担责任,并愿意参与指责的对话。在承担责任的过程中,他们变得理应受到谴责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信