Somatotype, Body Composition and Anthropometric Profiles of Indian Male Greco-Roman Wrestlers

Atriya Neogi, Apoorva Tiwari, T. Medabala, Snehunsu Adhikari, S. Dey
{"title":"Somatotype, Body Composition and Anthropometric Profiles of Indian Male Greco-Roman Wrestlers","authors":"Atriya Neogi, Apoorva Tiwari, T. Medabala, Snehunsu Adhikari, S. Dey","doi":"10.5812/intjssh.93102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Wrestling is known as a sport which highly requires physical preparation besides performing techniques such as clinch, fighting, throws and takedowns, joint locks, pins and other grappling holds. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to assess body composition, anthropometric profiles and somatotype rating of young male Greco-Roman wrestlers and sedentary controls. Methods: Nine heavyweight category wrestlers with mean age of 16.2 ± 0.89 years, 19 lightweight category male wrestlers with mean age of 16.4 ± 0.95 years, and 50 sedentary males with mean age of 16.9 ± 0.94 years, were recruited for the study. Results: The results suggested that heavyweight category wrestlers were taller (178.3± 5.76), heavier (76.5± 8.17) than the other two categories. Body surface area was also found to be highest (1.95±0.15) while sedentary controls were found to be highest in %BF (12.4 ± 2.10). Somatotype rating of the heavyweights, lightweights and sedentary controls were 4.3 5.0 2.6, 4.1 5.1 2.2 and 4.6 2.9 2.8 respectively. Wrestlers were found to be endomorphic-mesomorph while the controls were balanced endomorph. A significant (P < 0.05) differences were noticed almost in all the parameters except bicep and endomorphic component when compared among the groups. Body height, weight, BSA and suprailliac skin fold were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) differed when compared between the weight category groups. ANOM plot revealed that insignificant somatotype mean variation exist between the weight categories. Wrestler of Poland, Turkey and Iran have also reported that the %BF, BMI and somatotype rating scores which was higher in Greco-Roman wrestlers. Conclusions: The present study compared the different anthropometric characteristics, somatotype rating and body composition profiles of Greco-Roman wrestlers and sedentary control groups. Differences in various parameters were found to be being related to training regimen and their socio-economic status.","PeriodicalId":118920,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport Studies for Health","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport Studies for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/intjssh.93102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Wrestling is known as a sport which highly requires physical preparation besides performing techniques such as clinch, fighting, throws and takedowns, joint locks, pins and other grappling holds. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to assess body composition, anthropometric profiles and somatotype rating of young male Greco-Roman wrestlers and sedentary controls. Methods: Nine heavyweight category wrestlers with mean age of 16.2 ± 0.89 years, 19 lightweight category male wrestlers with mean age of 16.4 ± 0.95 years, and 50 sedentary males with mean age of 16.9 ± 0.94 years, were recruited for the study. Results: The results suggested that heavyweight category wrestlers were taller (178.3± 5.76), heavier (76.5± 8.17) than the other two categories. Body surface area was also found to be highest (1.95±0.15) while sedentary controls were found to be highest in %BF (12.4 ± 2.10). Somatotype rating of the heavyweights, lightweights and sedentary controls were 4.3 5.0 2.6, 4.1 5.1 2.2 and 4.6 2.9 2.8 respectively. Wrestlers were found to be endomorphic-mesomorph while the controls were balanced endomorph. A significant (P < 0.05) differences were noticed almost in all the parameters except bicep and endomorphic component when compared among the groups. Body height, weight, BSA and suprailliac skin fold were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) differed when compared between the weight category groups. ANOM plot revealed that insignificant somatotype mean variation exist between the weight categories. Wrestler of Poland, Turkey and Iran have also reported that the %BF, BMI and somatotype rating scores which was higher in Greco-Roman wrestlers. Conclusions: The present study compared the different anthropometric characteristics, somatotype rating and body composition profiles of Greco-Roman wrestlers and sedentary control groups. Differences in various parameters were found to be being related to training regimen and their socio-economic status.
印度男性古典式摔跤手的体型、身体组成和人体测量特征
背景:摔跤是一项非常需要身体准备的运动,除了要表演诸如搂抱、打斗、摔倒、锁关节、钉钉等擒拿技巧外。目的:本研究的目的是评估年轻男性古典式摔跤运动员和久坐对照组的身体组成、人体测量特征和体型评级。方法:选取9名平均年龄为16.2±0.89岁的重量级摔跤手、19名平均年龄为16.4±0.95岁的轻量级摔跤手和50名平均年龄为16.9±0.94岁的久坐男性进行研究。结果:重量级摔跤运动员身高(178.3±5.76),体重(76.5±8.17)高于其他两个类别。体表面积最高(1.95±0.15),而久坐对照组的BF %最高(12.4±2.10)。体重组、体重组和久坐组的体型评分分别为4.3 5.0 2.6、4.1 5.1 2.2和4.6 2.9 2.8。摔跤运动员被发现是内形态-中形态,而对照组是平衡内形态。各组间除肱二头肌和自胚成分外,其余指标均有显著性差异(P < 0.05)。体重类别组间体高、体重、BSA和髌上皮褶差异显著(P < 0.05)。ANOM图显示,体重类别之间存在不显著的体型平均变异。波兰、土耳其和伊朗的摔跤手也报告说,希腊罗马摔跤手的%BF、BMI和体型评分得分更高。结论:本研究比较了古典式摔跤运动员和久坐对照组不同的人体测量特征、体型等级和身体成分。发现各种参数的差异与训练方案及其社会经济地位有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信