Standardization of National Bereavement Rights Compromises Minorities’ Civic Equality

S. Ben-Asher, Israel Sorek, Eldad Shidlovsky
{"title":"Standardization of National Bereavement Rights Compromises Minorities’ Civic Equality","authors":"S. Ben-Asher, Israel Sorek, Eldad Shidlovsky","doi":"10.1080/17419166.2023.2210471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Standardization is a mechanism used to create uniformity and express the equal status of citizens facing governmental institutions. However, when standardization in various life aspects ignores fundamental differences between groups and individuals, it might increase inequality, compromise justice, and create explicit or implicit discrimination. This study exposes the mistake of identifying standardization with equality by looking at a specific and complex human situation. The linkage between standards and justice will be examined through three angles: philosophical, economic, and social. As a case study we will examine the case of Bedouin IDF widows. This group of women suffers from the uniformity of rights granted to widows of IDF (Israeli Defense Forces) soldiers, since the benefits included within these rights are not suitable to their lifestyle. We will demonstrate how culture-insensitive standards distort distributive justice and prevent certain groups, usually marginal and excluded ones, from accessing the resources and benefits to which they are entitled. We will claim that only a policy that considers personal, social, and cultural needs will enable true democratic equality, as opposed to technical, bureaucratic uniformity; and that only considering the two sides of the standardization coin will lead to genuine equity, which recognizes diversity and acknowledges its social value.","PeriodicalId":375529,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Security","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democracy and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2023.2210471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Standardization is a mechanism used to create uniformity and express the equal status of citizens facing governmental institutions. However, when standardization in various life aspects ignores fundamental differences between groups and individuals, it might increase inequality, compromise justice, and create explicit or implicit discrimination. This study exposes the mistake of identifying standardization with equality by looking at a specific and complex human situation. The linkage between standards and justice will be examined through three angles: philosophical, economic, and social. As a case study we will examine the case of Bedouin IDF widows. This group of women suffers from the uniformity of rights granted to widows of IDF (Israeli Defense Forces) soldiers, since the benefits included within these rights are not suitable to their lifestyle. We will demonstrate how culture-insensitive standards distort distributive justice and prevent certain groups, usually marginal and excluded ones, from accessing the resources and benefits to which they are entitled. We will claim that only a policy that considers personal, social, and cultural needs will enable true democratic equality, as opposed to technical, bureaucratic uniformity; and that only considering the two sides of the standardization coin will lead to genuine equity, which recognizes diversity and acknowledges its social value.
国家丧亲权的规范化损害了少数民族的公民平等
标准化是一种创造统一性和表达公民面对政府机构平等地位的机制。然而,当生活各个方面的标准化忽略了群体和个人之间的根本差异时,可能会增加不平等,损害正义,并产生或明或暗的歧视。这项研究揭示了通过观察一个具体而复杂的人类情况,将标准化等同于平等的错误。标准与正义之间的联系将从哲学、经济和社会三个角度进行考察。作为一个案例研究,我们将研究贝都因以色列国防军寡妇的情况。这群妇女受到给予以色列国防军(以色列国防军)士兵遗孀的统一权利的影响,因为这些权利所包括的福利不适合她们的生活方式。我们将展示文化不敏感的标准如何扭曲分配正义,并阻止某些群体(通常是边缘群体和被排斥群体)获得他们有权获得的资源和利益。我们将声称,只有考虑到个人、社会和文化需求的政策才能实现真正的民主平等,而不是技术上的、官僚主义的统一;只有考虑到标准化硬币的两面,才会导致真正的公平,即承认多样性并承认其社会价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信