Women’s Writing during the Dutch Revolt: the Religious Authority and Political Agenda of Cornelia and Susanna Teellinck, 1554–1625

Amanda C. Pipkin
{"title":"Women’s Writing during the Dutch Revolt: the Religious Authority and Political Agenda of Cornelia and Susanna Teellinck, 1554–1625","authors":"Amanda C. Pipkin","doi":"10.1163/9789004391352_004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was once widely accepted that early modern women chose to write on religious subjects because this was a less audacious, more modest type of authorship than original works on secular subjects.1 Over the last twentyfive years, however, scholars of English religious history have repudiated this notion, following Phyllis Mack’s lead in highlighting the political dimensions of women’s religious writings.2 Historian Patricia Crawford explained that religion was women’s most powerful justification for activity outside their conventional roles.”3 However, this shift in perspective has not yet been adopted by Dutch scholars who have argued that Netherlandish women were not able to engage in impassioned or controversial political debate before the eighteenth century.4 This article will reveal that sixteenthand seventeenth-century Netherlandish women did indeed employ Reformed Protestantism not only to justify their desire to write and publish, but also to supply the religious language they used to articulate political concerns without running afoul of the Reformed Church. As early as 1572, two years prior to the seven northern provinces’ adoption of the Reformed Church as the official religion, two sisters living in the province of Zeeland justified the writing, the circulation, and eventually the publication of their written work through their adherence to orthodox Calvinism. This study of Cornelia Teellinck (1554–1576) and Susanna Teellinck (1551–1625)","PeriodicalId":198400,"journal":{"name":"Women and Gender in the Early Modern Low Countries, 1500 - 1750","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Gender in the Early Modern Low Countries, 1500 - 1750","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391352_004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It was once widely accepted that early modern women chose to write on religious subjects because this was a less audacious, more modest type of authorship than original works on secular subjects.1 Over the last twentyfive years, however, scholars of English religious history have repudiated this notion, following Phyllis Mack’s lead in highlighting the political dimensions of women’s religious writings.2 Historian Patricia Crawford explained that religion was women’s most powerful justification for activity outside their conventional roles.”3 However, this shift in perspective has not yet been adopted by Dutch scholars who have argued that Netherlandish women were not able to engage in impassioned or controversial political debate before the eighteenth century.4 This article will reveal that sixteenthand seventeenth-century Netherlandish women did indeed employ Reformed Protestantism not only to justify their desire to write and publish, but also to supply the religious language they used to articulate political concerns without running afoul of the Reformed Church. As early as 1572, two years prior to the seven northern provinces’ adoption of the Reformed Church as the official religion, two sisters living in the province of Zeeland justified the writing, the circulation, and eventually the publication of their written work through their adherence to orthodox Calvinism. This study of Cornelia Teellinck (1554–1576) and Susanna Teellinck (1551–1625)
荷兰起义期间的女性写作:科妮莉亚和苏珊娜·特林克的宗教权威和政治议程,1554-1625
人们一度普遍认为,早期现代女性之所以选择写宗教题材的作品,是因为与世俗题材的原创作品相比,这是一种不那么大胆、更谦虚的创作方式然而,在过去的25年里,英国宗教史学者们在菲利斯·麦克(Phyllis Mack)的领导下,强调了女性宗教作品的政治维度,从而否定了这一观念历史学家帕特里夏·克劳福德解释说,宗教是女性在传统角色之外活动的最有力理由。然而,这种观点的转变尚未被荷兰学者所接受,他们认为,在18世纪之前,荷兰妇女无法参与充满激情或有争议的政治辩论这篇文章将揭示16和17世纪的荷兰妇女确实采用了改革宗新教,这不仅是为了证明她们写作和出版的愿望是正当的,也是为了提供她们用来表达政治关切的宗教语言,而不会与改革宗教会发生冲突。早在1572年,也就是北部七省将改革宗教会作为官方宗教的两年前,泽兰省的两姐妹就通过坚持正统的加尔文主义,为她们的写作、流通和最终出版的书面作品辩护。Cornelia Teellinck(1554-1576)和Susanna Teellinck(1551-1625)的研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信