Comparative Analysis of Direct and Indirect Current Control of Master-Slave Scheme for Microgrid

A. Elnady, M. Suleiman
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Direct and Indirect Current Control of Master-Slave Scheme for Microgrid","authors":"A. Elnady, M. Suleiman","doi":"10.1109/ICoPESA54515.2022.9754458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The master-slave control is an important scheme to control the microgrid in both islanded and grid-connected modes. It has been proved that it is competitive to the droop control schemes. This presented paper shows two techniques to control the current/power of the slave inverters to precisely adjust the injected output power of the slave inverters. The adopted microgrid contains two multilevel (five-level diode-clamped) inverters. One inverter is operated as a slave inverter and the remaining inverter is operated as a master inverter. The slave inverter can be operated using two techniques. The slave inverter is operated in a direct current control (DCC) mode using nested multiband hysteresis current control. While the second technique is the indirect current control (ICC) mode through the cascaded structure of power and current loops. Simulation results show a comparative analysis, which affirms that the DCC gives much better performance for current/power control, while the ICC gives a slightly better performance for voltage stabilization at loads.","PeriodicalId":142509,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Power Energy Systems and Applications (ICoPESA)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Power Energy Systems and Applications (ICoPESA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoPESA54515.2022.9754458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The master-slave control is an important scheme to control the microgrid in both islanded and grid-connected modes. It has been proved that it is competitive to the droop control schemes. This presented paper shows two techniques to control the current/power of the slave inverters to precisely adjust the injected output power of the slave inverters. The adopted microgrid contains two multilevel (five-level diode-clamped) inverters. One inverter is operated as a slave inverter and the remaining inverter is operated as a master inverter. The slave inverter can be operated using two techniques. The slave inverter is operated in a direct current control (DCC) mode using nested multiband hysteresis current control. While the second technique is the indirect current control (ICC) mode through the cascaded structure of power and current loops. Simulation results show a comparative analysis, which affirms that the DCC gives much better performance for current/power control, while the ICC gives a slightly better performance for voltage stabilization at loads.
微电网主从方案直接与间接电流控制的比较分析
主从控制是孤岛型和并网型微电网控制的一种重要方案。结果表明,该控制方案与下垂控制方案具有较强的竞争力。本文介绍了控制从逆变器电流/功率的两种技术,以精确调节从逆变器的注入输出功率。所采用的微电网包含两个多电平(五电平二极管箝位)逆变器。其中一个逆变器作为从逆变器运行,其余逆变器作为主逆变器运行。从逆变器可以使用两种技术进行操作。从逆变器采用嵌套式多频带迟滞电流控制,以直流控制(DCC)方式运行。第二种技术是间接电流控制(ICC)模式,通过功率回路和电流回路的级联结构。仿真结果进行了对比分析,证实了DCC在电流/功率控制方面具有更好的性能,而ICC在负载电压稳定方面具有稍好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信