Sagi Janitra, Mohammad Ghufron Az, Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani
{"title":"Asas kebebasan berkontrak dan perlindungan konsumen dalam kontrak baku pada internet banking","authors":"Sagi Janitra, Mohammad Ghufron Az, Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani","doi":"10.26905/idjch.v12i3.7361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For customers, internet banking service facilities provide the advantage of being able to make online payments. Internet banking also provides accommodation for banking activities through computer networks anytime and anywhere quickly, easily, and safely because it is supported by a strong security system, especially for those who are always busy managing their finances. As for the formulation of the problem in this paper, how is the use of the principle of freedom of contract in standard contracts on internet banking seen from the point of view of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning consumer protection and what is the legal protection for internet banking users for the contents of the standard contract? The result of this research is that the standard agreement on internet banking in its contents must be in accordance with the legal bases and articles that have been regulated in Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, where the agreement is not allowed if it harms the party implementing the agreement standard which in this case is a customer or debtor and the Bank is responsible for carrying out all obligations contained in the Banking Act, also in the Consumer Protection Act. The bank is also responsible for losses suffered by customers, whether they arise due to system errors or due to errors made by bank officers. A bank can only be released from its responsibilities after fulfilling its performance and paying compensation to the customer, or if the loss is due to the customer's fault or due to a compelling situation.How to cite item: Janitra, S., Ghufron Az, M., Wisnuwardhani, D. (2021). Asas kebebasan berkontrak dan perlindungan konsumen dalam kontrak baku pada internet banking. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(3), 334-343. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i3.7361.","PeriodicalId":207438,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i3.7361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
For customers, internet banking service facilities provide the advantage of being able to make online payments. Internet banking also provides accommodation for banking activities through computer networks anytime and anywhere quickly, easily, and safely because it is supported by a strong security system, especially for those who are always busy managing their finances. As for the formulation of the problem in this paper, how is the use of the principle of freedom of contract in standard contracts on internet banking seen from the point of view of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning consumer protection and what is the legal protection for internet banking users for the contents of the standard contract? The result of this research is that the standard agreement on internet banking in its contents must be in accordance with the legal bases and articles that have been regulated in Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, where the agreement is not allowed if it harms the party implementing the agreement standard which in this case is a customer or debtor and the Bank is responsible for carrying out all obligations contained in the Banking Act, also in the Consumer Protection Act. The bank is also responsible for losses suffered by customers, whether they arise due to system errors or due to errors made by bank officers. A bank can only be released from its responsibilities after fulfilling its performance and paying compensation to the customer, or if the loss is due to the customer's fault or due to a compelling situation.How to cite item: Janitra, S., Ghufron Az, M., Wisnuwardhani, D. (2021). Asas kebebasan berkontrak dan perlindungan konsumen dalam kontrak baku pada internet banking. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(3), 334-343. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i3.7361.
对于客户来说,网上银行服务设施提供了可以进行网上支付的优势。网上银行还通过计算机网络随时随地、快速、方便、安全地进行银行活动,因为它有强大的安全系统支持,特别适合那些总是忙于管理财务的人。对于本文问题的提法,从1999年关于消费者保护的第8号法律的角度来看,如何看待网络银行标准合同中合同自由原则的运用,以及标准合同的内容对网络银行用户的法律保护是什么?这项研究的结果是,标准协议网络银行在其内容必须按照法律基地和文章,在法律监管8号1999有关消费者保护的协议是不允许的,如果它危害党实现协议标准,在这种情况下是一个客户或债务人和银行负责实施中包含的所有义务银行法、消费者保护法。银行也对客户遭受的损失负责,无论这些损失是由于系统错误还是由于银行工作人员的错误造成的。银行履行义务并向客户支付赔偿后,或者损失是由于客户的过错或者迫不得已的情况造成的,才能免除责任。引用方式:李建军,李建军,李建军,李建军(2013)。as kebebasan berkontrak dan perlindungan konsumen dalam kontrak baku pada网上银行。中华医学杂志,12(3),334-343。doi: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i3.7361。