Perencanaan Pengembangan Usaha Tani Perhutan Kerakyatan Di Daerah Tangkapan Gumbasa Bagian Hulu, Donggala, SULTENG (Studi Kasus Sub-sub Daerah Aliran Sungai Toranda)

Hariyono
{"title":"Perencanaan Pengembangan Usaha Tani Perhutan Kerakyatan Di Daerah Tangkapan Gumbasa Bagian Hulu, Donggala, SULTENG (Studi Kasus Sub-sub Daerah Aliran Sungai Toranda)","authors":"Hariyono","doi":"10.53488/jba.v3i01.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Research amed to determind policy introduce social forestry management development as a sustainable in Gumbasa Catchment Area – Donggala – Central Sulawesi. Research by case study from Subs Toranda Watershed,, included: social preference analysis for social forestry management development by MPE Approach, financial feasebility analysis by social economic method approach and soil erosion analysis by trial erosion approach, in cacao land use monoculture (traditional) 9% slope and 37%, cacao land use by SUPK/SFMU 10% slope and 38% and open land use 5% slope at all each 3 X so 15 sample unit. The result that social preference to choice commodity priorities farm develop SUPK/SFMU are; 1) Jati, 2) Mahoni3) Nantu/Nyatoh, 4) Cempaka, 5) Ebony, 6) Kemiri, 7) Avocado, Farm financial feasibility SUPK/SFMU by B/C ratio = 4,92 and IRR = 40% higher than cacao farm monoculture by B/C ratio 3,01 and IRR 35%. Cacao land use monoculture, SUPK/SFMU, open land use with erosion.Rate more from social erosion what can be accept (TSL). Land use erosion y cacao land use SUPK/SFMU can be reduce soil erosion 77,2% on slope “agak miring” and 74% on slope “agak curam” than cacao land use monoculture.","PeriodicalId":164157,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Bakti Agribisnis","volume":"323 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Bakti Agribisnis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53488/jba.v3i01.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Research amed to determind policy introduce social forestry management development as a sustainable in Gumbasa Catchment Area – Donggala – Central Sulawesi. Research by case study from Subs Toranda Watershed,, included: social preference analysis for social forestry management development by MPE Approach, financial feasebility analysis by social economic method approach and soil erosion analysis by trial erosion approach, in cacao land use monoculture (traditional) 9% slope and 37%, cacao land use by SUPK/SFMU 10% slope and 38% and open land use 5% slope at all each 3 X so 15 sample unit. The result that social preference to choice commodity priorities farm develop SUPK/SFMU are; 1) Jati, 2) Mahoni3) Nantu/Nyatoh, 4) Cempaka, 5) Ebony, 6) Kemiri, 7) Avocado, Farm financial feasibility SUPK/SFMU by B/C ratio = 4,92 and IRR = 40% higher than cacao farm monoculture by B/C ratio 3,01 and IRR 35%. Cacao land use monoculture, SUPK/SFMU, open land use with erosion.Rate more from social erosion what can be accept (TSL). Land use erosion y cacao land use SUPK/SFMU can be reduce soil erosion 77,2% on slope “agak miring” and 74% on slope “agak curam” than cacao land use monoculture.
策划在贡巴萨北部、东加拉、苏丹等海运地区的Kerakyatan农场发展业务
该研究旨在确定政策,将社会林业管理发展引入冈巴萨集水区-东加拉-中苏拉威西的可持续发展。研究以Subs Toranda流域为例,包括:MPE方法对社会林业经营发展的社会偏好分析、社会经济方法的财务可行性分析和试验侵蚀法的土壤侵蚀分析,在可可土地利用单一(传统)9%坡度和37%、SUPK/SFMU可可土地利用10%坡度和38%以及露天土地利用5%坡度的情况下,各3 × 15个样本单位。结果表明:社会偏好优先选择商品的农场发展SUPK/SFMU;1) Jati, 2) Mahoni3) Nantu/Nyatoh, 4) Cempaka, 5)乌木,6)Kemiri, 7)牛油果,农场财务可行性SUPK/SFMU比单一可可农场B/C比3,01和IRR高40%。可可土地利用单一栽培,SUPK/SFMU,开放土地利用与侵蚀。从社会侵蚀的角度来看,什么是可以接受的(TSL)。与单一可可土地利用相比,可可土地利用SUPK/SFMU可减少“阿加克挖”坡的土壤侵蚀77.2%,“阿加克挖”坡的土壤侵蚀74%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信