The Pre-1914 Origins of Hitler's Antisemitism Revisited- Response

Moshe Zimmermann
{"title":"The Pre-1914 Origins of Hitler's Antisemitism Revisited- Response","authors":"Moshe Zimmermann","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2020.1709306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has now been about forty years since Eberhard Jäckel and Axel Kühn published the documentation Hitler – Sämtliche Aufzeichnungen, 1905–1924. It did not take much time to discover that about one-tenth of the documents published in this volume were fake – or, in other words, that even respectable historians could be deceived when it comes to information about Hitler. Indeed, thirty years after the demise of the Third Reich, biographies of Hitler were in abundance, written by both authoritative and amateur historians. But the lust for more was insatiable. This opened the gate to forgers and scoundrels like August Priesack, who supplied Jäckel with fake Hitler letters, or Konrad Kujau, who sold Hitler’s fake diaries to the respectable weekly Stern in 1983. Since then, at the latest, we – both historians and laypeople – have become extremely cautious, even suspicious, when it comes to new revelations and new documents about Hitler, especially young Hitler, since it is particularly difficult to corroborate the information about this stage of his career. Thomas Weber managed to write his two groundbreaking books about the earlier, lessdocumented chapters in Hitler’s career – Hitler’s First War (2010) and Becoming Hitler: The Making of a Nazi (2017) – apparently without falling into the pitfall of fake documents. Combining intensive research in the archives with a talent for intricate interpretations, the outcome is a coherent and unconventional story about the ‘making’ of Hitler before he became a ‘star’ in German and world politics. Some have found Weber’s findings too speculative, but not unreliable. It is worth mentioning here that the Koebner Center for German History at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem published Thomas Weber’s article about Hitler in World War I in its periodical Tabur back in 2009, so Hebrew readers got a notion of Weber’s findings a year before Hitler’s First War appeared in English. One of the more intriguing lacunae in Hitler’s biography concerns his becoming an antisemite. Eberhard Jäckel, right after publishing the above-mentioned documentation, referred to Hitler’s 16 September 1919 speech as his first documented ‘outing’ as an antisemite. The mystery remained how to explain the lack of evidence about Hitler’s attitude toward antisemitism before age thirty. Neither Brigitte Hamann in Hitlers Wien (1996) nor Thomas Weber in Hitler’s First War could identify open and direct expressions of antisemitic views in Hitler. Hamann mentioned Hitler’s later reference to Otto Weininger and Arthur Trebitsch and the fact that Schoenerer and Lueger were politically active during young Hitler’s time in Vienna but solely as indirect background for his later","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2020.1709306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has now been about forty years since Eberhard Jäckel and Axel Kühn published the documentation Hitler – Sämtliche Aufzeichnungen, 1905–1924. It did not take much time to discover that about one-tenth of the documents published in this volume were fake – or, in other words, that even respectable historians could be deceived when it comes to information about Hitler. Indeed, thirty years after the demise of the Third Reich, biographies of Hitler were in abundance, written by both authoritative and amateur historians. But the lust for more was insatiable. This opened the gate to forgers and scoundrels like August Priesack, who supplied Jäckel with fake Hitler letters, or Konrad Kujau, who sold Hitler’s fake diaries to the respectable weekly Stern in 1983. Since then, at the latest, we – both historians and laypeople – have become extremely cautious, even suspicious, when it comes to new revelations and new documents about Hitler, especially young Hitler, since it is particularly difficult to corroborate the information about this stage of his career. Thomas Weber managed to write his two groundbreaking books about the earlier, lessdocumented chapters in Hitler’s career – Hitler’s First War (2010) and Becoming Hitler: The Making of a Nazi (2017) – apparently without falling into the pitfall of fake documents. Combining intensive research in the archives with a talent for intricate interpretations, the outcome is a coherent and unconventional story about the ‘making’ of Hitler before he became a ‘star’ in German and world politics. Some have found Weber’s findings too speculative, but not unreliable. It is worth mentioning here that the Koebner Center for German History at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem published Thomas Weber’s article about Hitler in World War I in its periodical Tabur back in 2009, so Hebrew readers got a notion of Weber’s findings a year before Hitler’s First War appeared in English. One of the more intriguing lacunae in Hitler’s biography concerns his becoming an antisemite. Eberhard Jäckel, right after publishing the above-mentioned documentation, referred to Hitler’s 16 September 1919 speech as his first documented ‘outing’ as an antisemite. The mystery remained how to explain the lack of evidence about Hitler’s attitude toward antisemitism before age thirty. Neither Brigitte Hamann in Hitlers Wien (1996) nor Thomas Weber in Hitler’s First War could identify open and direct expressions of antisemitic views in Hitler. Hamann mentioned Hitler’s later reference to Otto Weininger and Arthur Trebitsch and the fact that Schoenerer and Lueger were politically active during young Hitler’s time in Vienna but solely as indirect background for his later
回顾1914年前希特勒反犹主义的起源——回应
埃伯哈德Jäckel和阿克塞尔k恩发表文件《希特勒- Sämtliche Aufzeichnungen, 1905-1924》距今已有40年。没过多久就发现,这本书中发表的文件中约有十分之一是假的——换句话说,即使是受人尊敬的历史学家,在涉及希特勒的信息时也可能被欺骗。的确,在第三帝国灭亡三十年后,权威和业余历史学家撰写了大量关于希特勒的传记。但对更多的渴望是无法满足的。这为造假者和恶棍打开了大门,比如奥古斯特·普里萨克(August Priesack),他向Jäckel提供了希特勒的假信件,或者康拉德·库乔(Konrad Kujau),他在1983年把希特勒的假日记卖给了受人尊敬的《斯特恩》周刊。从那时起,最迟,我们——历史学家和外行——在涉及到关于希特勒,特别是年轻的希特勒的新启示和新文件时,变得极其谨慎,甚至怀疑,因为关于他职业生涯这一阶段的信息特别难以证实。托马斯·韦伯(Thomas Weber)成功地写了两本开创性的书,讲述了希特勒职业生涯中早期记录较少的章节——《希特勒的第一次战争》(2010年)和《成为希特勒:一个纳粹的形成》(2017年)——显然没有落入伪造文件的陷阱。结合对档案的深入研究和对复杂解释的天赋,结果是一个连贯而非传统的故事,讲述了希特勒在成为德国和世界政治的“明星”之前的“成就”。有些人认为韦伯的发现过于推测,但并非不可靠。值得一提的是,早在2009年,耶路撒冷希伯来大学的Koebner德国历史中心就在其期刊《Tabur》上发表了托马斯·韦伯关于第一次世界大战中希特勒的文章,因此希伯来读者在《希特勒的第一次战争》英文版出版前一年就知道了韦伯的发现。在希特勒的传记中,一个比较耐人寻味的空白涉及他成为一名反犹主义者。Eberhard Jäckel,就在发表上述文件之后,提到希特勒1919年9月16日的演讲是他作为反犹主义者的第一次有记录的“外出”。如何解释希特勒在30岁之前对反犹主义的态度缺乏证据,仍然是一个谜。无论是布丽吉特·哈曼在《希特勒的维也纳》(1996)中的作品,还是托马斯·韦伯在《希特勒的第一次战争》中的作品,都无法在希特勒身上找到公开和直接的反犹观点表达。哈曼提到希特勒后来提到奥托·魏宁格和亚瑟·特雷比施,以及舍纳勒和吕格在希特勒年轻时在维也纳的政治活动,但这只是他后来的间接背景
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信