A Shot in the Arm: How to Improve Vaccination Policy in Canada

C. Busby, Nicholas Chesterley
{"title":"A Shot in the Arm: How to Improve Vaccination Policy in Canada","authors":"C. Busby, Nicholas Chesterley","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2578035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent outbreaks of measles in many parts of Canada draw attention to the importance of vaccination policy design, especially for children. Most Canadian provinces fail to meet national immunization targets for key diseases, and coverage ratios among children in a few provinces, where data are well kept and upto-date, are falling over time. If immunization coverage continues to fall, more vulnerable populations, such as children, the elderly, and people with medical conditions that may prevent them from being immunized, will be put at risk. Arguably, the general societal expectation in Canada is that people will get vaccinated, but barriers to access and the complexity of the decision mean that parents without a family physician, those in lowincome households, single parents and new arrivals in Canada are likely to not immunize or just partially immunize their children. Some parents may be active objectors to immunization, and policymakers must be careful to avoid alienating them or driving them away from the system. Most, however, appear not to immunize their children not because they actively object to vaccines, but because of barriers to access, complacency, or procrastination. Those parents are the focus of this paper, and we argue should be a focus of Canadian immunization policy. In this Commentary, we take a particularly close look at policies in Ontario, Alberta and Newfoundland and Labrador. Alberta and Ontario are relatively large provinces with different policy approaches to vaccination delivery, one focused on early interventions and the other on making immunization decisions mandatory in schools. Both models have their advantages, but neither province has reached national vaccination coverage targets. Newfoundland and Labrador has a policy design similar to Alberta’s, but some of the highest vaccination coverage in Canada. Despite the success of Newfoundland and Labrador’s vaccination policies, we do not think that there is a one-size-fits-all solution for all provinces because the characteristics of populations are different across and within provinces. That said, some basic principles of a good policy framework are explored in this paper, including the requirement for parents to make a vaccination decision, the early collection of data, access to vaccines, scope of practice, and how information is presented to new parents. We believe that well-designed vaccination policies could reach national targets while still accommodating choice. We argue that a key policy step, in provinces where needed, is to track immunization status from birth to better identify vulnerable regions in the event of an outbreak and better remind parents of the importance of immunization. Comprehensive registries at birth could help to coordinate subsequent parental reminders to immunize, and allow health officials to provide the information most relevant to parents. Further, we suggest reforms that ensure getting immunized is as easy as possible and that new parents be strongly encouraged to make a vaccination decision.","PeriodicalId":353219,"journal":{"name":"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2578035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Recent outbreaks of measles in many parts of Canada draw attention to the importance of vaccination policy design, especially for children. Most Canadian provinces fail to meet national immunization targets for key diseases, and coverage ratios among children in a few provinces, where data are well kept and upto-date, are falling over time. If immunization coverage continues to fall, more vulnerable populations, such as children, the elderly, and people with medical conditions that may prevent them from being immunized, will be put at risk. Arguably, the general societal expectation in Canada is that people will get vaccinated, but barriers to access and the complexity of the decision mean that parents without a family physician, those in lowincome households, single parents and new arrivals in Canada are likely to not immunize or just partially immunize their children. Some parents may be active objectors to immunization, and policymakers must be careful to avoid alienating them or driving them away from the system. Most, however, appear not to immunize their children not because they actively object to vaccines, but because of barriers to access, complacency, or procrastination. Those parents are the focus of this paper, and we argue should be a focus of Canadian immunization policy. In this Commentary, we take a particularly close look at policies in Ontario, Alberta and Newfoundland and Labrador. Alberta and Ontario are relatively large provinces with different policy approaches to vaccination delivery, one focused on early interventions and the other on making immunization decisions mandatory in schools. Both models have their advantages, but neither province has reached national vaccination coverage targets. Newfoundland and Labrador has a policy design similar to Alberta’s, but some of the highest vaccination coverage in Canada. Despite the success of Newfoundland and Labrador’s vaccination policies, we do not think that there is a one-size-fits-all solution for all provinces because the characteristics of populations are different across and within provinces. That said, some basic principles of a good policy framework are explored in this paper, including the requirement for parents to make a vaccination decision, the early collection of data, access to vaccines, scope of practice, and how information is presented to new parents. We believe that well-designed vaccination policies could reach national targets while still accommodating choice. We argue that a key policy step, in provinces where needed, is to track immunization status from birth to better identify vulnerable regions in the event of an outbreak and better remind parents of the importance of immunization. Comprehensive registries at birth could help to coordinate subsequent parental reminders to immunize, and allow health officials to provide the information most relevant to parents. Further, we suggest reforms that ensure getting immunized is as easy as possible and that new parents be strongly encouraged to make a vaccination decision.
一针强心针:如何改善加拿大的疫苗接种政策
最近在加拿大许多地区爆发的麻疹使人们注意到疫苗接种政策设计的重要性,特别是对儿童。加拿大大多数省份未能达到针对主要疾病的国家免疫目标,在数据保存良好和最新的少数省份,儿童的覆盖率随着时间的推移正在下降。如果免疫接种覆盖率继续下降,儿童、老年人和患有可能阻止他们接种疫苗的疾病的人等更脆弱的人群将面临风险。可以说,加拿大的普遍社会期望是人们会接种疫苗,但接种疫苗的障碍和决定的复杂性意味着,没有家庭医生的父母、低收入家庭的父母、单亲父母和新到加拿大的人很可能不会给孩子接种疫苗,或者只是给孩子接种部分疫苗。一些家长可能是免疫接种的积极反对者,政策制定者必须小心避免疏远他们或使他们远离该系统。然而,大多数人似乎不给孩子接种疫苗,不是因为他们积极反对疫苗,而是因为获取疫苗的障碍、自满或拖延。这些父母是本文的重点,我们认为应该是加拿大免疫政策的重点。在本评论中,我们特别仔细地研究了安大略省、阿尔伯塔省和纽芬兰和拉布拉多省的政策。艾伯塔省和安大略省是相对较大的省份,在提供疫苗接种方面采取不同的政策方法,一个侧重于早期干预,另一个侧重于在学校强制作出免疫接种决定。这两种模式都有其优势,但两个省都没有达到全国疫苗接种覆盖目标。纽芬兰和拉布拉多省的政策设计与阿尔伯塔省类似,但在加拿大疫苗接种覆盖率最高。尽管纽芬兰和拉布拉多的疫苗接种政策取得了成功,但我们不认为存在一种适用于所有省份的万能解决方案,因为各省之间和各省内部的人口特征是不同的。也就是说,本文探讨了良好政策框架的一些基本原则,包括要求父母做出疫苗接种决定、早期收集数据、获得疫苗、实践范围以及如何向新父母提供信息。我们认为,设计良好的疫苗接种政策可以在满足选择的同时实现国家目标。我们认为,在有需要的省份,一个关键的政策步骤是从出生开始跟踪免疫状况,以便在爆发疫情时更好地确定脆弱地区,并更好地提醒家长免疫接种的重要性。出生时的全面登记可以帮助协调随后的父母提醒接种疫苗,并使卫生官员能够提供与父母最相关的信息。此外,我们建议进行改革,确保接种疫苗尽可能容易,并强烈鼓励新父母做出接种疫苗的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信