Aesthetic Criteria

P. Juslin
{"title":"Aesthetic Criteria","authors":"P. Juslin","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198753421.003.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on proposals from philosophical aesthetics and on preliminary research findings, this chapter suggests that listeners' aesthetic criteria for music will tend to include, but not be limited to, eight broad dimensions, each of which is discussed in turn. These include beauty, expression, novelty, emotion, skill, message, style, and the sublime. There is something to be said for each of these eight criterion candidates for aesthetic value: music lacking in expression is not art at all; music without beauty is not easy to like; music without novelty is not interesting; music without skills is mediocre; music that does not arouse emotions fails to produce embodied experiences; music that lacks stylistic unity is incoherent; music without a message or intention is empty; and music that is not sublime will not change your life. In contrast, music that manages to cover all these criteria is very likely to be judged as aesthetically valuable.","PeriodicalId":227459,"journal":{"name":"Musical Emotions Explained","volume":"446 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musical Emotions Explained","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198753421.003.0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Based on proposals from philosophical aesthetics and on preliminary research findings, this chapter suggests that listeners' aesthetic criteria for music will tend to include, but not be limited to, eight broad dimensions, each of which is discussed in turn. These include beauty, expression, novelty, emotion, skill, message, style, and the sublime. There is something to be said for each of these eight criterion candidates for aesthetic value: music lacking in expression is not art at all; music without beauty is not easy to like; music without novelty is not interesting; music without skills is mediocre; music that does not arouse emotions fails to produce embodied experiences; music that lacks stylistic unity is incoherent; music without a message or intention is empty; and music that is not sublime will not change your life. In contrast, music that manages to cover all these criteria is very likely to be judged as aesthetically valuable.
审美标准
基于哲学美学的建议和初步的研究结果,本章建议听众对音乐的审美标准将倾向于包括但不限于八个广泛的维度,每个维度依次讨论。这些包括美、表达、新奇、情感、技巧、信息、风格和崇高。对于审美价值的这八个候选标准,每一个都有一些话要说:缺乏表达的音乐根本不是艺术;没有美感的音乐不易被人喜欢;没有新意的音乐是无趣的;没有技巧的音乐是平庸的;不能唤起情感的音乐不能产生具体的体验;缺乏风格统一的音乐是不连贯的;没有信息和意图的音乐是空洞的;不崇高的音乐不会改变你的生活。相比之下,能够满足所有这些标准的音乐很可能被认为具有美学价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信