Angela J. Martin, R. Giallo
{"title":"Confirmatory Factor Analysis of a Questionnaire Measure of Managerial Stigma Towards Employee Depression.","authors":"Angela J. Martin, R. Giallo","doi":"10.1002/smi.2655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Managers' attitudes play a key role in how organizations respond to employees with depression. We examine the measurement properties of a questionnaire designed to assess managerial stigma towards employees with depression. Using data from a sample of 469 Australian managers representing a wide range of industries and work settings, we conducted a confirmatory factor analysis to assess three proposed subscales representing affective, cognitive and behavioural forms of stigma. Results were equivocal indicating acceptable fit for two-factor (affective and cognitive + behavioural), three-factor (affective, cognitive and behavioural) and higher order models. Failure to demonstrate the discriminant validity of the cognitive and behavioural dimensions, even though they are theoretically distinct, suggests that further work on the scale is warranted. These results provide an extension to the psychometric profile of this measure (exploratory factor analysis; Martin, ). Development of strategies to operationalize this construct will benefit occupational health research and practice, particularly in interventions that aim to reduce the stigma of mental health issues in the workplace or where managers' attitudes are a key mechanism in intervention efficacy. We encourage future research on this measure pertaining in particular to further enhancing all aspects of its construct validity. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":309674,"journal":{"name":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","volume":"261 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
员工抑郁管理污名问卷测量的验证性因子分析。
管理者的态度在组织如何应对患有抑郁症的员工中起着关键作用。我们检查了一份问卷的测量属性,该问卷旨在评估管理对抑郁症员工的污名。使用来自469名澳大利亚经理的样本数据,代表了广泛的行业和工作环境,我们进行了验证性因素分析,以评估三个提议的子量表,代表了情感、认知和行为形式的耻辱。结果模棱两可,表明双因素(情感和认知+行为)、三因素(情感、认知和行为)和高阶模型可接受的拟合。未能证明认知和行为维度的区别有效性,即使它们在理论上是不同的,这表明有必要对量表进行进一步的研究。这些结果为该测量的心理测量特征提供了扩展(探索性因素分析;马丁,)。制定实施这一构想的战略将有利于职业健康研究和实践,特别是在旨在减少工作场所对心理健康问题的耻辱感或管理者态度是干预效果的关键机制的干预措施方面。我们鼓励对这一措施进行进一步的研究,特别是进一步提高其结构效度的各个方面。版权所有©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。