Antimicrobial Resistance Measures at Facilities for the Elderly: A Fact-finding Survey on Infection Control Measures at Private Nursing Homes and Long-term Care Insurance Facilities

Ye-Seul Oh, M. Aminaka, Namiko Mori, M. Nishioka
{"title":"Antimicrobial Resistance Measures at Facilities for the Elderly: A Fact-finding Survey on Infection Control Measures at Private Nursing Homes and Long-term Care Insurance Facilities","authors":"Ye-Seul Oh, M. Aminaka, Namiko Mori, M. Nishioka","doi":"10.4058/jsei.36.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to examine the nature of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) measures by clarifying the actual state of such measures at private nursing homes and long-term care insurance facilities. Infection control staff at a total of 2,800 randomly sampled facilities for the elderly (private nursing homes, designated facilities covered by public aid providing long-term care to the elderly, long-term care health facilities, and medical long-term care sanatoriums) were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire. The responses of 254 (9.1%) facilities were tabulated. The conditions for hindering the spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria were being met at private nursing homes, but outbreaks of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), extended spectrum beta-Lactamase-producing bacteria, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci infections had occurred like at other types of facilities. AMR measures at facilities for the elderly, such as availability of manuals, training, and measures upon admission, were insufficient. Screening upon admission was only implemented at 22% ― 33% of the facilities, and the target bacterium in screening was almost always limited to MRSA. There were also issues with care that facilitates the spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (such as urethral indwelling catheter management and diaper care). Accordingly, this demonstrated the risk of the spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria from overlooked carriers. These findings suggest that because AMR measures at facilities for the elderly do not require screening upon admission, it may be effective to strengthen contact precautions in addition to standard precautions during provision of care that facilitates the spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria to all residents. Medical care and long-term care fee incentives are also needed to pro-mote support from public health centers and regional core hospitals.","PeriodicalId":414784,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4058/jsei.36.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the nature of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) measures by clarifying the actual state of such measures at private nursing homes and long-term care insurance facilities. Infection control staff at a total of 2,800 randomly sampled facilities for the elderly (private nursing homes, designated facilities covered by public aid providing long-term care to the elderly, long-term care health facilities, and medical long-term care sanatoriums) were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire. The responses of 254 (9.1%) facilities were tabulated. The conditions for hindering the spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria were being met at private nursing homes, but outbreaks of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), extended spectrum beta-Lactamase-producing bacteria, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci infections had occurred like at other types of facilities. AMR measures at facilities for the elderly, such as availability of manuals, training, and measures upon admission, were insufficient. Screening upon admission was only implemented at 22% ― 33% of the facilities, and the target bacterium in screening was almost always limited to MRSA. There were also issues with care that facilitates the spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (such as urethral indwelling catheter management and diaper care). Accordingly, this demonstrated the risk of the spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria from overlooked carriers. These findings suggest that because AMR measures at facilities for the elderly do not require screening upon admission, it may be effective to strengthen contact precautions in addition to standard precautions during provision of care that facilitates the spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria to all residents. Medical care and long-term care fee incentives are also needed to pro-mote support from public health centers and regional core hospitals.
老年人设施的抗菌素耐药性措施:对私立养老院和长期护理保险机构感染控制措施的实况调查
本研究的目的是通过澄清私人养老院和长期护理保险机构的实际状况来检查抗菌素耐药性(AMR)措施的性质。采用自行填写的问卷,对随机抽样的2,800个老年人设施(私人养老院、向老年人提供长期护理的公共援助覆盖的指定设施、长期护理卫生设施和医疗长期护理疗养院)的感染控制人员进行了调查。将254个(9.1%)设施的反应制成表格。在私人疗养院,阻止耐药细菌传播的条件已得到满足,但与其他类型的设施一样,也发生了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、广谱β -内酰胺酶产生细菌、耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌科、耐多药铜绿假单胞菌、耐多药不动杆菌和耐万古霉素肠球菌感染的暴发。老年人设施的抗菌素耐药性措施,如手册、培训和入院时的措施,都是不够的。只有22% - 33%的医院在入院时进行筛查,而且筛查的目标细菌几乎总是局限于MRSA。护理方面也存在促进耐药细菌传播的问题(如尿道留置导管管理和尿布护理)。因此,这证明了被忽视的携带者传播抗微生物细菌的风险。这些发现表明,由于老年人设施的抗菌素耐药性措施不需要在入院时进行筛查,因此除了在提供护理期间的标准预防措施外,加强接触预防可能是有效的,这有助于耐药细菌向所有居民传播。还需要提供医疗保健和长期护理费用奖励,以促进公共卫生中心和区域核心医院的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信