Legal tools for amicable dispute resolution in Belgian (family) courts

S.E.P. Raes
{"title":"Legal tools for amicable dispute resolution in Belgian (family) courts","authors":"S.E.P. Raes","doi":"10.5553/FenR/.000038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alternative/amicable dispute resolution (ADR) is omnipresent these days. In line with global developments, the Belgian legislator has embraced the use of ADR mechanisms, starting with family law. In 2013, Belgium took a major step forward in promoting ADR in family matters. A duty to inform regarding all types of ADR was introduced for both the judge’s clerk and the Family Court itself. In addition, a specific ‘Chamber of Amicable Settlement’ was created within the Family Court, where a trained and actively involved family judge now helps the parties to negotiate an agreement. Hence, in-court ADR was installed by law. Prior to this legislative reform, other initiatives had been taken, but had proven to be insufficient. In 2018, a more comprehensive reform followed, which envisioned implementation of ADR not only in family cases, but in all civil cases. When it comes to ADR, too often all eyes are on mediation. This article primarily considers the understudied subject of the Belgian Chamber of Amicable Settlement, which could highlight areas of concern for foreign in-court ADR systems as well. The ultimate aim of this chamber is to restore people’s faith in the justice system, improve the degree of satisfaction of the parties involved with both the process and the outcome, and have the parties reach a solution tailored to their needs in a fast and low-cost manner. Given the myriad of possible benefits and the lack of research on this topic, these settlements need to be investigated more thoroughly; all the more so because of the upcoming legislative evaluation , the goal of which is to implement best practices in all Family Courts in Belgium. Firstly, this article aims to acquaint the reader with the specific, lesser-known concept of amicable settlement by briefly explaining its 1","PeriodicalId":167265,"journal":{"name":"The Family in Law","volume":"11 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Family in Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5553/FenR/.000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative/amicable dispute resolution (ADR) is omnipresent these days. In line with global developments, the Belgian legislator has embraced the use of ADR mechanisms, starting with family law. In 2013, Belgium took a major step forward in promoting ADR in family matters. A duty to inform regarding all types of ADR was introduced for both the judge’s clerk and the Family Court itself. In addition, a specific ‘Chamber of Amicable Settlement’ was created within the Family Court, where a trained and actively involved family judge now helps the parties to negotiate an agreement. Hence, in-court ADR was installed by law. Prior to this legislative reform, other initiatives had been taken, but had proven to be insufficient. In 2018, a more comprehensive reform followed, which envisioned implementation of ADR not only in family cases, but in all civil cases. When it comes to ADR, too often all eyes are on mediation. This article primarily considers the understudied subject of the Belgian Chamber of Amicable Settlement, which could highlight areas of concern for foreign in-court ADR systems as well. The ultimate aim of this chamber is to restore people’s faith in the justice system, improve the degree of satisfaction of the parties involved with both the process and the outcome, and have the parties reach a solution tailored to their needs in a fast and low-cost manner. Given the myriad of possible benefits and the lack of research on this topic, these settlements need to be investigated more thoroughly; all the more so because of the upcoming legislative evaluation , the goal of which is to implement best practices in all Family Courts in Belgium. Firstly, this article aims to acquaint the reader with the specific, lesser-known concept of amicable settlement by briefly explaining its 1
比利时(家事)法院友好解决纠纷的法律工具
替代性/友好争议解决(ADR)如今无处不在。根据全球发展,比利时立法者从家庭法开始,接受了ADR机制的使用。2013年,比利时在推进家庭事务ADR方面迈出重要一步。法官书记员和家事法院本身都有义务告知所有类型的ADR。此外,在家事法院内设立了一个专门的“友好解决分庭”,由一名训练有素和积极参与的家事法官协助当事方谈判达成协议。因此,法律规定了庭内ADR。在这项立法改革之前,已经采取了其他主动行动,但证明是不够的。2018年,一项更全面的改革随之而来,该改革设想ADR不仅在家庭案件中实施,而且在所有民事案件中实施。当涉及到ADR时,所有的目光往往都集中在调解上。本文主要考虑比利时友好解决商会未被充分研究的主题,这也可以突出外国法院内ADR制度的关注领域。本分庭的最终目的是恢复人民对司法制度的信心,提高有关各方对程序和结果的满意程度,并使各方以快速和低成本的方式达成适合其需要的解决方案。考虑到可能带来的无数好处和对这一主题缺乏研究,需要对这些定居点进行更彻底的调查;由于即将进行的立法评估,其目标是在比利时所有家庭法院执行最佳做法,因此更是如此。首先,本文旨在通过对“和解”的1 .简要解释,使读者对“和解”这个具体的、鲜为人知的概念有所了解
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信