WHO IS THE MOST AUTHORIZED TO ERADICATE ILLEGAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTION ?

Suwinto Johan, Gunardi Lie, Amad Sudiro
{"title":"WHO IS THE MOST AUTHORIZED TO ERADICATE ILLEGAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTION ?","authors":"Suwinto Johan, Gunardi Lie, Amad Sudiro","doi":"10.36987/jiad.v11i1.3224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Illegal financial institutions have repeatedly appeared and disappeared in the community. Illegal banks or savings institutions disguise their businesses as travel agents or public fund savings institutions called arisan. At the moment, there have been emerging illegal online loan institutions (Pinjol). In 2021, illegal online loans (Pinjol) become a trending topic in Indonesia. Illegal lending has become a long-standing issue in society. The authorities have carried out the eradication of illegal lending. However, illegal borrowing is never completely eradicated and is always present in the community. Illegal borrowing has also caused a lot of community problems. This research aims to examine the illegal borrowing in the midst of society. This research uses a normative juridical method. This research concludes that eradicating illegal lending is the responsibility of the police, not the responsibility of the Indonesian Financial Services Authority (OJK). Even though illegal lenders operate in the financial industry, the Indonesian Financial Services Authority has no authority over the illegal financial industry. The authority of the Indonesian Financial Services Authority has been confirmed in Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2011. The illegal financial industry does not only exist in the financial technology industry, but has also emerged repeatedly in the conventional financial industry, such as illegal banks, fraudulent investments, and credit unions.","PeriodicalId":127108,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v11i1.3224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Illegal financial institutions have repeatedly appeared and disappeared in the community. Illegal banks or savings institutions disguise their businesses as travel agents or public fund savings institutions called arisan. At the moment, there have been emerging illegal online loan institutions (Pinjol). In 2021, illegal online loans (Pinjol) become a trending topic in Indonesia. Illegal lending has become a long-standing issue in society. The authorities have carried out the eradication of illegal lending. However, illegal borrowing is never completely eradicated and is always present in the community. Illegal borrowing has also caused a lot of community problems. This research aims to examine the illegal borrowing in the midst of society. This research uses a normative juridical method. This research concludes that eradicating illegal lending is the responsibility of the police, not the responsibility of the Indonesian Financial Services Authority (OJK). Even though illegal lenders operate in the financial industry, the Indonesian Financial Services Authority has no authority over the illegal financial industry. The authority of the Indonesian Financial Services Authority has been confirmed in Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2011. The illegal financial industry does not only exist in the financial technology industry, but has also emerged repeatedly in the conventional financial industry, such as illegal banks, fraudulent investments, and credit unions.
谁最有权力铲除非法金融机构?
非法金融机构在社会上屡屡出现和消失。非法银行或储蓄机构将其业务伪装成旅行社或公共资金储蓄机构(arisan)。目前,非法网贷机构(品约)层出不穷。2021年,非法网络贷款(Pinjol)成为印尼的热门话题。非法借贷已经成为一个长期存在的社会问题。当局开展了铲除非法借贷的行动。然而,非法借贷从来没有完全根除,并一直存在于社会。非法借贷也造成了许多社会问题。本研究旨在检视社会中的非法借贷。本研究采用规范的法学方法。这项研究的结论是,根除非法贷款是警察的责任,而不是印尼金融服务管理局(OJK)的责任。尽管金融行业存在非法放贷者,但印尼金融服务管理局对非法金融行业没有权力。印度尼西亚金融服务管理局的权力已在印度尼西亚共和国2011年第21号法律中得到确认。非法金融行业不仅存在于金融科技行业,在常规金融行业也屡有出现,如非法银行、欺诈投资、信用合作社等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信