Intelligent demand response for electricity consumers: A multi-armed bandit game approach

Zibo Zhao, Andrew L. Liu
{"title":"Intelligent demand response for electricity consumers: A multi-armed bandit game approach","authors":"Zibo Zhao, Andrew L. Liu","doi":"10.1109/ISAP.2017.8071376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Real-time electricity pricing (RTP) for consumers has long been argued to be key to realize the many envisioned benefits of a smart energy grid. How to actually implement an RTP scheme, however, is still under debate. Since most of the organized wholesale power markets in the US implement a two-settlement system, with day-ahead electricity price forecasts guiding financial and physical transactions in the next day and real-time ex post prices settling any real-time imbalances, it is a natural idea to let consumers respond to the day-ahead prices. Such an idea, however, may lead to consumers all respond in the same fashion, causing large swings of the energy demand and prices, which may jeopardize system stability and increase consumers' financial risks. To overcome this issue, we propose a game-theoretic framework in which each consumer solves a multi-armed bandit problem; that is, consumers learn from the history and attempts to minimize their regrets. The consequence is drastically reduced volatility on real-time prices and much flatter load curves for the entire grid. Such results are not only based on simulation, but are also supported by theories of mean-field equilibria in multi-armed bandit games.","PeriodicalId":257100,"journal":{"name":"2017 19th International Conference on Intelligent System Application to Power Systems (ISAP)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 19th International Conference on Intelligent System Application to Power Systems (ISAP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISAP.2017.8071376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Real-time electricity pricing (RTP) for consumers has long been argued to be key to realize the many envisioned benefits of a smart energy grid. How to actually implement an RTP scheme, however, is still under debate. Since most of the organized wholesale power markets in the US implement a two-settlement system, with day-ahead electricity price forecasts guiding financial and physical transactions in the next day and real-time ex post prices settling any real-time imbalances, it is a natural idea to let consumers respond to the day-ahead prices. Such an idea, however, may lead to consumers all respond in the same fashion, causing large swings of the energy demand and prices, which may jeopardize system stability and increase consumers' financial risks. To overcome this issue, we propose a game-theoretic framework in which each consumer solves a multi-armed bandit problem; that is, consumers learn from the history and attempts to minimize their regrets. The consequence is drastically reduced volatility on real-time prices and much flatter load curves for the entire grid. Such results are not only based on simulation, but are also supported by theories of mean-field equilibria in multi-armed bandit games.
电力消费者的智能需求响应:一种多手强盗博弈方法
长期以来,消费者实时电价(RTP)一直被认为是实现智能电网诸多预期效益的关键。然而,如何实际实现RTP方案仍在争论中。由于美国大多数有组织的批发电力市场实行双重结算制度,前一天的电价预测指导第二天的金融和实物交易,实时事后价格解决任何实时不平衡,因此让消费者对前一天的价格做出反应是一个自然的想法。然而,这样的想法可能会导致所有的消费者都以同样的方式做出反应,造成能源需求和价格的大幅波动,这可能会危及系统的稳定性,增加消费者的金融风险。为了克服这个问题,我们提出了一个博弈论框架,其中每个消费者解决一个多武装强盗问题;也就是说,消费者从历史中吸取教训,尽量减少自己的遗憾。其结果是大大降低了实时价格的波动性,并使整个电网的负荷曲线更加平坦。这些结果不仅基于仿真,而且还得到了多手强盗博弈中平均场均衡理论的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信