A Comparison Analysis of Efficiency between Construction Firms

Heetae Kim, Hyun-seok Lee
{"title":"A Comparison Analysis of Efficiency between Construction Firms","authors":"Heetae Kim, Hyun-seok Lee","doi":"10.22423/kreus.2022.15.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare the management efficiency of classified domestic construction firm to each categories by company sale scale, and sale type. In particular, the characteristics of contract-oriented construction firms with high construction sales and development-oriented construction firms with high parcel-out sales are compared and analyzed. We use the financial statement values for 10 years from 2011 to 2020 for companies registered with the Korea Construction Association, and compare the management efficiency of construction firms through the absolute efficiency (Dupont) and the relative efficiency (DEA) analysis. \nAccording to the research results, first, it is found that contract-oriented construction firms show a trend in management efficiency similar to the average of all construction firms, but development-oriented construction firms continue to maintain high management efficiency throughout the study period. Second, as for absolute management efficiency, developmentoriented construction firm show high return on equity. This is attributable to the relatively high net profit margin on assets and net profit on sales, and the cost of sales, SG&A expenses, and non-operating expenses are lower than contract-oriented construction firms. \nThird, relative management efficiency also shows that development-oriented construction firms show higher management efficiency compare to contract-oriented construction firms. It is analyzed that development-oriented firm have higher management efficiency than contractoriented construction firm because they have a low cost ratio and non-operating expenses. \nAs a result, it is found that, similar to all construction firms, the management efficiency of contract construction companies changes according to changes in the construction industry, but development-oriented construction firms consistently show high return on capital and net profit efficiency.","PeriodicalId":146040,"journal":{"name":"Konkuk Research Institute of Real Estate and Urban Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konkuk Research Institute of Real Estate and Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22423/kreus.2022.15.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to compare the management efficiency of classified domestic construction firm to each categories by company sale scale, and sale type. In particular, the characteristics of contract-oriented construction firms with high construction sales and development-oriented construction firms with high parcel-out sales are compared and analyzed. We use the financial statement values for 10 years from 2011 to 2020 for companies registered with the Korea Construction Association, and compare the management efficiency of construction firms through the absolute efficiency (Dupont) and the relative efficiency (DEA) analysis. According to the research results, first, it is found that contract-oriented construction firms show a trend in management efficiency similar to the average of all construction firms, but development-oriented construction firms continue to maintain high management efficiency throughout the study period. Second, as for absolute management efficiency, developmentoriented construction firm show high return on equity. This is attributable to the relatively high net profit margin on assets and net profit on sales, and the cost of sales, SG&A expenses, and non-operating expenses are lower than contract-oriented construction firms. Third, relative management efficiency also shows that development-oriented construction firms show higher management efficiency compare to contract-oriented construction firms. It is analyzed that development-oriented firm have higher management efficiency than contractoriented construction firm because they have a low cost ratio and non-operating expenses. As a result, it is found that, similar to all construction firms, the management efficiency of contract construction companies changes according to changes in the construction industry, but development-oriented construction firms consistently show high return on capital and net profit efficiency.
建筑企业效率的比较分析
本研究以企业销售规模、销售类型为指标,比较国内建筑企业分类管理效率。特别是,比较分析了具有高建筑销售额的合同型建筑企业和具有高分割销售额的开发型建筑企业的特点。我们以韩国建设协会注册企业2011 ~ 2020年10年间的财务报表价值为基础,通过绝对效率(Dupont)和相对效率(DEA)分析,比较了建设企业的经营效率。研究结果表明:第一,承包型建筑企业的管理效率趋势与所有建筑企业的平均水平相似,而开发型建筑企业在整个研究期间继续保持较高的管理效率。第二,在绝对管理效率方面,发展型建筑企业具有较高的净资产收益率。这是由于相对较高的资产净利润率和销售净利润,以及销售成本、SG&A费用和非营业费用低于合同导向型建筑公司。第三,相对管理效率也表明,开发型建筑企业的管理效率高于合同型建筑企业。分析认为,开发型企业的成本比较低,营业外费用较低,因此其管理效率高于承包型企业。结果发现,与所有建筑企业一样,合同建筑企业的管理效率也会随着建筑行业的变化而变化,但开发型建筑企业始终表现出较高的资本回报率和净利润效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信