Cross Border Insolvency: A Pearl in the Ocean

K. H. H. S. B. S. R. K. V. D. Kishore Kumar
{"title":"Cross Border Insolvency: A Pearl in the Ocean","authors":"K. H. H. S. B. S. R. K. V. D. Kishore Kumar","doi":"10.52783/cienceng.v11i1.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International Insolvency can also be termed as Cross Border Insolvency, when the debtor having assets or liabilities in more than one jurisdiction. International insolvency sometimes termed as Cross-Border insolvency was in practice since early stages in England and it was governed by the common Law of England. The Solomon v. Rosswas the first case recorded in 1764, in this case English creditor brought action in England against the sum owing to the Dutch firm which was declared as bankrupt in Netherlands. The historical development of Cross-Border insolvency can be traced back since modern Private International Law’s birth, when state use to enter into agreements and sign treaties, to harmonize their relationship and to resolve their conflicts. The treaty of Montevideowas signed by five countries in 1889 to harmonize their fiscal policies, was the first to recognise Cross-border Insolvency. Due to the Advent of globalisation, The insolvency Law Committee was formed for drafting the bill of Insolvency and Bankruptcy bill and it Included 2 provisions for dealing with the Cross Border Insolvency issues and the increasing foreign direct investment in India, there is a strong need of increasing incorporation of company in various jurisdictions and there is an urgent need for Law on Cross Border Insolvency for solving the disputes across jurisdictions","PeriodicalId":214525,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding International Conference on Science and Engineering","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding International Conference on Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52783/cienceng.v11i1.213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International Insolvency can also be termed as Cross Border Insolvency, when the debtor having assets or liabilities in more than one jurisdiction. International insolvency sometimes termed as Cross-Border insolvency was in practice since early stages in England and it was governed by the common Law of England. The Solomon v. Rosswas the first case recorded in 1764, in this case English creditor brought action in England against the sum owing to the Dutch firm which was declared as bankrupt in Netherlands. The historical development of Cross-Border insolvency can be traced back since modern Private International Law’s birth, when state use to enter into agreements and sign treaties, to harmonize their relationship and to resolve their conflicts. The treaty of Montevideowas signed by five countries in 1889 to harmonize their fiscal policies, was the first to recognise Cross-border Insolvency. Due to the Advent of globalisation, The insolvency Law Committee was formed for drafting the bill of Insolvency and Bankruptcy bill and it Included 2 provisions for dealing with the Cross Border Insolvency issues and the increasing foreign direct investment in India, there is a strong need of increasing incorporation of company in various jurisdictions and there is an urgent need for Law on Cross Border Insolvency for solving the disputes across jurisdictions
跨境破产:海洋中的一颗明珠
当债务人在一个以上的司法管辖区拥有资产或负债时,国际破产也可称为跨境破产。国际破产(有时被称为跨境破产)在英国的早期阶段就已在实践中,并受英国普通法管辖。所罗门诉罗斯案是1764年记载的第一个案件,在这个案件中,英国债权人在英国对在荷兰被宣布破产的荷兰公司所欠款项提起诉讼。跨国破产的历史发展可以追溯到现代国际私法诞生以来,当时国家通过签订协议和条约来协调国家间的关系,解决国家间的冲突。1889年,五个国家签署了《蒙得维的亚条约》,以协调它们的财政政策,这是第一个承认跨境破产的条约。由于全球化的到来,成立了破产法委员会来起草破产和破产法案,其中包括处理跨境破产问题和印度日益增加的外国直接投资的2条规定,迫切需要在各个司法管辖区增加公司的注册,迫切需要跨境破产法来解决跨司法管辖区的纠纷
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信