Women’s Participation in Governance and Political Processes in Kenya: Threats and Proposed Remedies

Geoffrey Kiplimo, H. Amunga
{"title":"Women’s Participation in Governance and Political Processes in Kenya: Threats and Proposed Remedies","authors":"Geoffrey Kiplimo, H. Amunga","doi":"10.51611/iars.irj.v11i2.2021.173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most recent studies on women’s political participation demonstrate that women are consistently denied adequate space and a level playing field to participate in politics and governance, especially in many global south countries, unlike their male counterparts. These studies’ most dominant claim is that these contexts’ patriarchal cultural norms mainly limit women’s central involvement in such nations’ political processes. Based on this impediment system, it follows that these environments become more unpropitious, hostile, and insecure for women in politics, which opens up and perpetuates possibilities for all manner of harm to them. Because of such threats, several scholars, religious leaders, and women activists decry the underrepresentation of women in politics, which in their understanding, has contributed to prolonged systemic discrimination through a legacy of insufficient woman-centric legislation and policy interventions. There is a consensus-based claim among the majority of these actors that this kind of inadequacy continues unabated due to a siloed thinking that inhibits a joined-up approach in tackling such discrimination. This paper seeks to further explore this claim through a broad stroke integrated review of literature that deals with women’s political participation in Kenya, where the concept of traditional gender role beliefs provides a vital backdrop for conducting it. Based on this concept’s valuable terms of reference, it is concluded that women need to be accorded a more enabling environment to participate in politics and, in this way, ensure that their ascension to leadership positions in governance becomes tenable. It is anticipated that such an assumption will increase legislation, policy and other interventions geared towards safeguarding women’s general participation in politics. In light of such conclusion, it is proposed that groundswell support is needed to ensure that the creation of a conducive environment for women to be involved in politics is realized, and in this way, their disenfranchisement based on their limited participation in politics is tackled. ","PeriodicalId":142446,"journal":{"name":"IARS' International Research Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IARS' International Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51611/iars.irj.v11i2.2021.173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The most recent studies on women’s political participation demonstrate that women are consistently denied adequate space and a level playing field to participate in politics and governance, especially in many global south countries, unlike their male counterparts. These studies’ most dominant claim is that these contexts’ patriarchal cultural norms mainly limit women’s central involvement in such nations’ political processes. Based on this impediment system, it follows that these environments become more unpropitious, hostile, and insecure for women in politics, which opens up and perpetuates possibilities for all manner of harm to them. Because of such threats, several scholars, religious leaders, and women activists decry the underrepresentation of women in politics, which in their understanding, has contributed to prolonged systemic discrimination through a legacy of insufficient woman-centric legislation and policy interventions. There is a consensus-based claim among the majority of these actors that this kind of inadequacy continues unabated due to a siloed thinking that inhibits a joined-up approach in tackling such discrimination. This paper seeks to further explore this claim through a broad stroke integrated review of literature that deals with women’s political participation in Kenya, where the concept of traditional gender role beliefs provides a vital backdrop for conducting it. Based on this concept’s valuable terms of reference, it is concluded that women need to be accorded a more enabling environment to participate in politics and, in this way, ensure that their ascension to leadership positions in governance becomes tenable. It is anticipated that such an assumption will increase legislation, policy and other interventions geared towards safeguarding women’s general participation in politics. In light of such conclusion, it is proposed that groundswell support is needed to ensure that the creation of a conducive environment for women to be involved in politics is realized, and in this way, their disenfranchisement based on their limited participation in politics is tackled. 
肯尼亚妇女参与治理和政治进程:威胁和建议的补救措施
最近关于妇女参政的研究表明,妇女一直被剥夺足够的空间和公平的竞争环境来参与政治和治理,特别是在许多全球南方国家,与男性同行不同。这些研究最主要的主张是,这些背景下的父权文化规范主要限制了女性在这些国家政治进程中的核心参与。基于这种障碍制度,这些环境对女性从政变得更加不利、充满敌意和不安全,这就为她们带来了各种伤害的可能性,并使其长期存在。由于这些威胁,一些学者、宗教领袖和妇女活动家谴责妇女在政治中的代表性不足,在他们看来,这是由于以妇女为中心的立法和政策干预不足造成的长期系统性歧视。这些行为者中的大多数人都有一种基于共识的说法,即这种不足之处继续有增无减,原因是一种孤立的思维,阻碍了在处理这种歧视问题上采取联合的办法。本文试图通过对涉及肯尼亚妇女政治参与的文献进行广泛的综合回顾,进一步探讨这一说法,传统性别角色信仰的概念为开展这一活动提供了重要的背景。根据这一概念的宝贵职权范围,得出的结论是,需要给予妇女更有利的环境,使她们能够参与政治,从而确保她们能够在管理中担任领导职务。预期这种假设将增加立法、政策和其他干预措施,以保障妇女普遍参与政治。根据这一结论,建议需要得到广泛的支持,以确保创造一个有利于妇女参与政治的环境,从而解决妇女因参与政治有限而被剥夺选举权的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信