Conceptual Mapping of Elements Impacting the Value of Knowledge

Muhammad Syed-ul Haque, Muhammad Asim
{"title":"Conceptual Mapping of Elements Impacting the Value of Knowledge","authors":"Muhammad Syed-ul Haque, Muhammad Asim","doi":"10.55464/pjar.v2i2.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge, being one of the most critical and essential resource of any organization is now unanimously considered as an asset. Yet it has no place in any of the financial statements that can mention its value or volume. Since the true worth of an organization is largely dependent on its capability to generate positive return in the future. This positive return is primarily based on the volume and the nature of knowledge and its efficient use. And the efficient use of knowledge asset is the unique design and proposition of organizational resources which itself depends on the knowledge. Therefore, it is impossible to ascertain the true worth of an organization without determining the value of knowledge it possesses. This research work attempts to present factors that have an impact on the value of knowledge. Data was collected from professionals and decision-makers who have responsibility related to knowledge management. Starting from the desk research, followed by interviews and questionnaire instrument, the data was collected from business managers working in various industries. Various statistical tools were employed to analyze the data and evaluate the identified items and factors. Finally, the two factors were identified after regrouping of items and initial factors through Principal Component Factor analysis. The new factors were named “Strategic Advantage” and “Core Capabilities”. The integration of “Strategic Advantage” and “Core Capabilities” forms the basic framework for valuing knowledge. The findings will lead to further research in knowledge management. Refinement of the suggested model would enable managers to differentiate the most valuable and useful knowledge assets from the least valuable knowledge. Investors would also benefit from the study as it may help them in evaluating/calculating the actual value/worth of an organization.","PeriodicalId":351847,"journal":{"name":"Propel Journal of Academic Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Propel Journal of Academic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55464/pjar.v2i2.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge, being one of the most critical and essential resource of any organization is now unanimously considered as an asset. Yet it has no place in any of the financial statements that can mention its value or volume. Since the true worth of an organization is largely dependent on its capability to generate positive return in the future. This positive return is primarily based on the volume and the nature of knowledge and its efficient use. And the efficient use of knowledge asset is the unique design and proposition of organizational resources which itself depends on the knowledge. Therefore, it is impossible to ascertain the true worth of an organization without determining the value of knowledge it possesses. This research work attempts to present factors that have an impact on the value of knowledge. Data was collected from professionals and decision-makers who have responsibility related to knowledge management. Starting from the desk research, followed by interviews and questionnaire instrument, the data was collected from business managers working in various industries. Various statistical tools were employed to analyze the data and evaluate the identified items and factors. Finally, the two factors were identified after regrouping of items and initial factors through Principal Component Factor analysis. The new factors were named “Strategic Advantage” and “Core Capabilities”. The integration of “Strategic Advantage” and “Core Capabilities” forms the basic framework for valuing knowledge. The findings will lead to further research in knowledge management. Refinement of the suggested model would enable managers to differentiate the most valuable and useful knowledge assets from the least valuable knowledge. Investors would also benefit from the study as it may help them in evaluating/calculating the actual value/worth of an organization.
影响知识价值的要素的概念映射
知识,作为任何组织最重要和最基本的资源之一,现在被一致认为是一种资产。然而,在任何能够提及其价值或数量的财务报表中,它都没有一席之地。因为一个组织的真正价值在很大程度上取决于它在未来产生正回报的能力。这种正回报主要是基于知识的数量和性质及其有效利用。知识资产的有效利用是对组织资源的独特设计和主张,而组织资源本身又依赖于知识。因此,不确定一个组织所拥有的知识的价值,就不可能确定它的真正价值。本研究工作试图呈现影响知识价值的因素。数据收集自与知识管理相关的专业人员和决策者。从桌面研究开始,然后是访谈和问卷调查工具,数据收集来自各行各业的企业经理。使用各种统计工具对数据进行分析,并对识别的项目和因素进行评估。最后,通过主成分因子分析,对项目和初始因子进行重组,确定两个因子。新的因素被命名为“战略优势”和“核心能力”。“战略优势”与“核心能力”的整合形成了知识价值的基本框架。研究结果将为知识管理的进一步研究提供指导。建议的模型的细化将使管理人员能够区分最有价值和有用的知识资产与最有价值的知识资产。投资者也会从这项研究中受益,因为它可以帮助他们评估/计算一个组织的实际价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信