Pricing Government Credit: A New Method for Determining Government Credit Risk Exposure

B. Ambrose, Zhongyi Yuan
{"title":"Pricing Government Credit: A New Method for Determining Government Credit Risk Exposure","authors":"B. Ambrose, Zhongyi Yuan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3298963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing debate centers on how best to recognize (and price) government interventions in the capital markets. This study applies a method for estimating and valuing the government?s exposure to credit risk through its loan and guarantee programs. The authors use the mortgage portfolios of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as examples of how policymakers could employ this method in pricing the government?s program credit risk. Building on the cost of capital approach, the method captures each program?s possible tail loss over and above its expected value. The authors then use a capital allocation approach to obtain each program?s marginal risk contribution. They show that the current practice of pricing the programs as stand-alone entities overestimates the value of the guarantee. By explicitly capturing the interaction of program losses, their method implies that the government?s overall capital reserve required to insulate taxpayers from losses can be lower than the reserve required when each program is evaluated in isolation. The authors also point out that the extent of this reduction hinges on the strength of (tail) dependence among the expected losses across the programs.","PeriodicalId":192010,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Governmental Loans","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Governmental Loans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3298963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A growing debate centers on how best to recognize (and price) government interventions in the capital markets. This study applies a method for estimating and valuing the government?s exposure to credit risk through its loan and guarantee programs. The authors use the mortgage portfolios of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as examples of how policymakers could employ this method in pricing the government?s program credit risk. Building on the cost of capital approach, the method captures each program?s possible tail loss over and above its expected value. The authors then use a capital allocation approach to obtain each program?s marginal risk contribution. They show that the current practice of pricing the programs as stand-alone entities overestimates the value of the guarantee. By explicitly capturing the interaction of program losses, their method implies that the government?s overall capital reserve required to insulate taxpayers from losses can be lower than the reserve required when each program is evaluated in isolation. The authors also point out that the extent of this reduction hinges on the strength of (tail) dependence among the expected losses across the programs.
政府信用定价:确定政府信用风险暴露的新方法
越来越多的争论集中在如何最好地认识(和定价)政府对资本市场的干预。本研究运用一种估算与评估政府绩效的方法。美国通过其贷款和担保计划暴露于信用风险之中。作者以房利美(Fannie Mae)和房地美(Freddie Mac)的抵押贷款组合为例,说明政策制定者如何利用这种方法为政府定价。S计划信用风险。在资本成本方法的基础上,该方法捕获了每个程序?S可能的尾部损失超过其期望值。然后,作者使用资本分配方法来获得每个程序?S边际风险贡献。它们表明,目前将这些计划作为独立实体定价的做法高估了担保的价值。通过明确地捕捉项目损失的相互作用,他们的方法意味着政府?美国为使纳税人免受损失所需的总资本准备金可能低于单独评估每个项目所需的准备金。作者还指出,这种减少的程度取决于整个计划中预期损失之间的(尾部)依赖性的强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信