Nationalism in the Age of Brexit: The Attitudes and Identities of Young Voters

Emma Wolkenstein
{"title":"Nationalism in the Age of Brexit: The Attitudes and Identities of Young Voters","authors":"Emma Wolkenstein","doi":"10.15273/jue.v12i1.11314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2016 Brexit referendum revealed a division between younger voters, a majority of whom voted Remain, and older voters, a majority of whom voted Leave. From virtual interviews with six British young adults, this article analyzes the effects of the Brexit referendum on their perceptions of belonging and national identity. My theoretical framework draws upon Benedict Anderson’s definition of the nation and Michael Skey’s and Craig Calhoun’s critique that feelings of equality among members are unrealistic due to the power and identity hierarchies that exist within a nation. Interviews reveal a strong binary conception of identities created through politics and media that divide voters into distinct, distanced groups. Young voters use harsh, derogatory language to describe oppositional groups, such as Conservatives, Leave voters, and older voters, to separate themselves and reinforce their identities. However, because these oppositional groups hold the most power, continuous separation reinforces feelings of powerlessness in politics and reveals hierarchies of identities. These hierarchies can have long-lasting implications for the United Kingdom as these younger voters will eventually comprise the voting majority and strive to see their values and beliefs represented in positions of power.","PeriodicalId":298867,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Undergraduate Ethnography","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Undergraduate Ethnography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/jue.v12i1.11314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2016 Brexit referendum revealed a division between younger voters, a majority of whom voted Remain, and older voters, a majority of whom voted Leave. From virtual interviews with six British young adults, this article analyzes the effects of the Brexit referendum on their perceptions of belonging and national identity. My theoretical framework draws upon Benedict Anderson’s definition of the nation and Michael Skey’s and Craig Calhoun’s critique that feelings of equality among members are unrealistic due to the power and identity hierarchies that exist within a nation. Interviews reveal a strong binary conception of identities created through politics and media that divide voters into distinct, distanced groups. Young voters use harsh, derogatory language to describe oppositional groups, such as Conservatives, Leave voters, and older voters, to separate themselves and reinforce their identities. However, because these oppositional groups hold the most power, continuous separation reinforces feelings of powerlessness in politics and reveals hierarchies of identities. These hierarchies can have long-lasting implications for the United Kingdom as these younger voters will eventually comprise the voting majority and strive to see their values and beliefs represented in positions of power.
英国脱欧时代的民族主义:年轻选民的态度和身份
2016年的英国脱欧公投揭示了年轻选民和年长选民之间的分歧,年轻选民中大多数人选择留欧,而年长选民中大多数人选择脱欧。本文通过对六位英国年轻人的虚拟采访,分析了英国脱欧公投对他们归属感和国家认同感的影响。我的理论框架借鉴了本尼迪克特·安德森对国家的定义,以及迈克尔·斯基和克雷格·卡尔霍恩的批评,即由于国家内部存在的权力和身份等级,成员之间的平等感觉是不现实的。采访揭示了一种强烈的二元身份观念,这种观念是由政治和媒体创造的,将选民划分为截然不同的、距离遥远的群体。年轻选民用严厉、贬损的语言来描述保守党、脱欧派和老年选民等反对派群体,以区分自己,强化自己的身份。然而,由于这些对立的群体掌握着最大的权力,持续的分离强化了政治中的无力感,并揭示了身份的等级制度。这些等级制度可能对英国产生长期影响,因为这些年轻选民最终将构成投票多数,并努力看到他们的价值观和信仰在权力职位上得到体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信