Performance Comparison of Feasible MMSE-PIC Algorithms with Channel Estimation for HSUPA

Ilkka Moilanen, Paavo Hahtola
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Feasible MMSE-PIC Algorithms with Channel Estimation for HSUPA","authors":"Ilkka Moilanen, Paavo Hahtola","doi":"10.1109/WCNC.2009.4917893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we study the speech user performance of selected parallel interference cancellation (PIC) algorithms in a single-cell high speed uplink packet access (HSUPA) system. To combat intersymbol interference (ISI), single-user chip-level minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) equalizer is used to detect the data users. PIC is applied to suppress the interference from data users to speech users, and RAKE to detect the speech users. As an input to the PIC stage, we may use the hard or soft symbol decisions (HD, SD) from the data users' demodulator or decoder outputs. The latter requires re-encoding of the decoded symbols. This adds to complexity, but increases also the reliability of the interference estimates. Results and analysis are provided for both ideal and MMSE channel estimation (CE). We show that the combination of PIC and RAKE outperforms the simple MMSE equalization in all studied cases. Using re-encoded soft symbol decisions for interference estimate calculation always leads to the best performance. However, in some scenarios the performance loss due to using the soft symbol decisions from the demodulator output is almost negligible.","PeriodicalId":186150,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNC.2009.4917893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, we study the speech user performance of selected parallel interference cancellation (PIC) algorithms in a single-cell high speed uplink packet access (HSUPA) system. To combat intersymbol interference (ISI), single-user chip-level minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) equalizer is used to detect the data users. PIC is applied to suppress the interference from data users to speech users, and RAKE to detect the speech users. As an input to the PIC stage, we may use the hard or soft symbol decisions (HD, SD) from the data users' demodulator or decoder outputs. The latter requires re-encoding of the decoded symbols. This adds to complexity, but increases also the reliability of the interference estimates. Results and analysis are provided for both ideal and MMSE channel estimation (CE). We show that the combination of PIC and RAKE outperforms the simple MMSE equalization in all studied cases. Using re-encoded soft symbol decisions for interference estimate calculation always leads to the best performance. However, in some scenarios the performance loss due to using the soft symbol decisions from the demodulator output is almost negligible.
HSUPA信道估计的可行MMSE-PIC算法性能比较
本文研究了在单cell高速上行分组接入(HSUPA)系统中所选择的并行干扰消除(PIC)算法的语音用户性能。为了对抗码间干扰(ISI),采用单用户芯片级最小均方误差(MMSE)均衡器检测数据用户。PIC用于抑制数据用户对语音用户的干扰,RAKE用于检测语音用户。作为PIC阶段的输入,我们可以使用来自数据用户的解调器或解码器输出的硬或软符号决定(HD, SD)。后者需要对已解码的符号进行重新编码。这增加了复杂性,但也增加了干扰估计的可靠性。给出了理想信道估计和MMSE信道估计的结果和分析。我们表明,在所有研究案例中,PIC和RAKE的组合优于简单的MMSE均衡。用重新编码的软符号判决进行干扰估计计算,往往能获得最佳的性能。然而,在某些情况下,由于使用软符号决定从解调器输出的性能损失几乎可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信