Controversy over the scope of the term “medical care” in the context of its exemption from value added tax

M. Czerwińska
{"title":"Controversy over the scope of the term “medical care” in the context of its exemption from value added tax","authors":"M. Czerwińska","doi":"10.16926/gea.2021.02.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generally, health care services that are intended to prevent, save, restore, and improve health are exempt from VAT. However, not every activity meets the requirements set by EU or national law. The rules regarding VAT exemptions for medical services are not precise enough to avoid controversy. Case law and tax interpretations help determine whether a medical service is exempt. However, it is not consistent. It is problematic to assess whether comprehensive services, services related to plastic surgery, and recently also medical advice by phone or internet are eligible for VAT exemption. These problems were signaled in the article.","PeriodicalId":166701,"journal":{"name":"Gubernaculum et Administratio","volume":"34 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gubernaculum et Administratio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16926/gea.2021.02.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generally, health care services that are intended to prevent, save, restore, and improve health are exempt from VAT. However, not every activity meets the requirements set by EU or national law. The rules regarding VAT exemptions for medical services are not precise enough to avoid controversy. Case law and tax interpretations help determine whether a medical service is exempt. However, it is not consistent. It is problematic to assess whether comprehensive services, services related to plastic surgery, and recently also medical advice by phone or internet are eligible for VAT exemption. These problems were signaled in the article.
在免除增值税的情况下,“医疗”一词的范围存在争议
一般来说,旨在预防、挽救、恢复和改善健康的医疗保健服务免征增值税。然而,并非每项活动都符合欧盟或国家法律规定的要求。关于医疗服务增值税免税的规定不够精确,无法避免争议。判例法和税收解释有助于确定医疗服务是否免税。然而,它并不一致。综合服务、与整形手术相关的服务以及最近通过电话或互联网提供的医疗咨询是否符合增值税免税资格的评估存在问题。这些问题在文章中都有提及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信