{"title":"When did the Luyia (or any other group) become a tribe?","authors":"J. MacArthur","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2014.893963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1977, John Lonsdale published a review of William R. Ochieng's study APre-Colonial History of the Gusii of Western Kenya in the Kenya Historical Review. Entitled “When did the Gusii (or any other group) become a ‘Tribe’?”, the ten-page article was less a book review and more a treatise on the practice of history in Africa. Taking Lonsdale's question as a point of inspiration, this article provides a critical rethinking of the theories of “tribe”, ethnicity and identity politics that continue to dominate African scholarship by examining the particular case of the Luyia in western Kenya. Through the seemingly incongruous and stubbornly diverse accounting of Luyia political community, this study suggests that histories of ethnic identity remain trapped by their own constructivist logic, elevating the “inventors” of traditional accounts at the expense of the plural and dissenting voices that characterise the multiple forms of political imagination practised across Africa that, while diverse, continue to rely on the idiom of the “tribe”.","PeriodicalId":172027,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of African Studies/ La Revue canadienne des études africaines","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of African Studies/ La Revue canadienne des études africaines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2014.893963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
In 1977, John Lonsdale published a review of William R. Ochieng's study APre-Colonial History of the Gusii of Western Kenya in the Kenya Historical Review. Entitled “When did the Gusii (or any other group) become a ‘Tribe’?”, the ten-page article was less a book review and more a treatise on the practice of history in Africa. Taking Lonsdale's question as a point of inspiration, this article provides a critical rethinking of the theories of “tribe”, ethnicity and identity politics that continue to dominate African scholarship by examining the particular case of the Luyia in western Kenya. Through the seemingly incongruous and stubbornly diverse accounting of Luyia political community, this study suggests that histories of ethnic identity remain trapped by their own constructivist logic, elevating the “inventors” of traditional accounts at the expense of the plural and dissenting voices that characterise the multiple forms of political imagination practised across Africa that, while diverse, continue to rely on the idiom of the “tribe”.
1977年,约翰·朗斯代尔(John Lonsdale)在《肯尼亚历史评论》上发表了对威廉·r·奥钦(William R. Ochieng)关于肯尼亚西部古西人前殖民历史的研究的评论。题目是“古斯人(或任何其他群体)什么时候成为一个‘部落’的?”,这篇10页的文章与其说是一篇书评,不如说是一篇关于非洲历史实践的论文。本文以Lonsdale的问题为灵感点,通过考察肯尼亚西部的Luyia人的特殊案例,对继续主导非洲学术的“部落”、种族和身份政治理论进行了批判性的反思。通过对鲁亚政治社区看似不协调且顽固多样的描述,本研究表明,种族认同的历史仍然被自己的建构主义逻辑所束缚,以牺牲多元和反对的声音为代价,提升了传统描述的“发明者”,这些声音是非洲各地实践的多种形式的政治想象的特征,尽管多样化,但仍然依赖于“部落”的习惯说法。