The Comparison of Students’ Reading Comprehension Between Natural Science and Social Science Students at State Senior High School 1 Tapung

Darliza Listari, Sultan Syarif, Kasim Riau
{"title":"The Comparison of Students’ Reading Comprehension Between Natural Science and Social Science Students at State Senior High School 1 Tapung","authors":"Darliza Listari, Sultan Syarif, Kasim Riau","doi":"10.24014/ijielt.v5i1.7750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to know the comparison of students’ reading comprehension in descriptive text between natural science and social science students at State senior High School 1 Tapung. The total population of this research was 210 students which consisted of seven classes, the researchers took 20% of the population as the sample by stratified random sampling. The design of this research was quanitative used comparative research. In collecting the data, the researchers distributed a reding comprehension test based on the indicators. After analyzing the data, the researchers found that that there was a significant difference of reading comprehension between natural science and social science students on reading descriptive text comprehension at the tenth grade of State Senior High School 1 Tapung. It was considered by t obtained = 3.329 that was higher than t-table either at 5% = 2.021 or 1% = 2.704. It means that Ha was accepted and Ho was rejected. From the research finding, it showed that there was a significant difference in reading comprehension of descriptive text between natural science and social science students at the tenth grade of State Senior High School 1 Tapung.","PeriodicalId":328105,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Integrated English Language Teaching","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Integrated English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24014/ijielt.v5i1.7750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to know the comparison of students’ reading comprehension in descriptive text between natural science and social science students at State senior High School 1 Tapung. The total population of this research was 210 students which consisted of seven classes, the researchers took 20% of the population as the sample by stratified random sampling. The design of this research was quanitative used comparative research. In collecting the data, the researchers distributed a reding comprehension test based on the indicators. After analyzing the data, the researchers found that that there was a significant difference of reading comprehension between natural science and social science students on reading descriptive text comprehension at the tenth grade of State Senior High School 1 Tapung. It was considered by t obtained = 3.329 that was higher than t-table either at 5% = 2.021 or 1% = 2.704. It means that Ha was accepted and Ho was rejected. From the research finding, it showed that there was a significant difference in reading comprehension of descriptive text between natural science and social science students at the tenth grade of State Senior High School 1 Tapung.
国立高中自然科学与社会科学学生阅读理解能力的比较
本研究的目的是了解国立一中自然科学学生和社会科学学生在描述性文本阅读理解方面的比较。本研究的总人数为210名学生,分为7个班级,研究人员采用分层随机抽样的方法抽取20%的学生作为样本。本研究设计采用定量比较研究法。在收集数据的过程中,研究人员根据这些指标分发了一份阅读理解测试。通过对数据的分析,研究人员发现,在国立高中一年级十年级,自然科学学生和社会科学学生在阅读描述性文本理解方面存在显著差异。根据得到的t = 3.329在5% = 2.021或1% = 2.704时均高于t-table。这意味着哈被接受了,何被拒绝了。从研究结果来看,国立高中一年级十年级自然科学学生与社会科学学生在描述性文本的阅读理解上存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信