Mapping the Backlash

Prabhash Ranjan
{"title":"Mapping the Backlash","authors":"Prabhash Ranjan","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780199493746.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter discusses how different actors or stakeholders such as the parliament, the government, civil society etc. started reacting to India’s BITs once India was flooded by ISDS claims. The reactions varied from asking the purpose of BITs, examining do BITs lead to greater FDI inflows, questioning the relationship between BITs and India’s right to regulate. There was a much deeper engagement with BITs in this phase than we saw in the ‘embracement’ phase. India launched the review of BITs in this phase and took certain decisions, which can be described as backlash against BITs. For instance, India terminated some of its BITs and also adopted a new Model BIT. The faith that India had showed towards BITs in the ‘embracement’ phase stood shaken.","PeriodicalId":203042,"journal":{"name":"India and Bilateral Investment Treaties","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"India and Bilateral Investment Treaties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199493746.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chapter discusses how different actors or stakeholders such as the parliament, the government, civil society etc. started reacting to India’s BITs once India was flooded by ISDS claims. The reactions varied from asking the purpose of BITs, examining do BITs lead to greater FDI inflows, questioning the relationship between BITs and India’s right to regulate. There was a much deeper engagement with BITs in this phase than we saw in the ‘embracement’ phase. India launched the review of BITs in this phase and took certain decisions, which can be described as backlash against BITs. For instance, India terminated some of its BITs and also adopted a new Model BIT. The faith that India had showed towards BITs in the ‘embracement’ phase stood shaken.
映射反弹
本章讨论了一旦印度被ISDS索赔淹没,议会、政府、民间社会等不同的行为者或利益相关者如何开始对印度的双边投资协定做出反应。人们的反应各不相同,有的询问双边投资协定的目的,有的审查双边投资协定是否会导致更多的外国直接投资流入,有的质疑双边投资协定与印度监管权之间的关系。与我们在“拥抱”阶段看到的相比,这一阶段与双边投资协定的接触要深入得多。印度在这一阶段启动了对双边投资协定的审查,并作出了一些决定,可以说是对双边投资协定的反弹。例如,印度终止了一些双边投资协定,并采用了新的双边投资协定模式。印度在“拥抱”阶段对双边投资协定表现出的信心动摇了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信