{"title":"Stratospheric wave driving events as an alternative to sudden stratospheric warmings","authors":"T. Reichler, M. Jucker","doi":"10.5194/wcd-3-659-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Natural variations in the strength of the northern\nstratospheric polar vortex, so-called polar vortex events, help to improve\nsubseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predictions of winter climate. Past research\non polar vortex events has been largely focused on sudden stratospheric\nwarming events (SSWs), a class of relatively strong weakenings of the polar\nvortex. Commonly, SSWs are defined when the polar vortex reverses its\nclimatological wintertime westerly wind direction. In this study, however,\nwe use an alternative definition, based on the weighted time-integrated\nupward wave activity flux at the lower stratosphere. We use a long control\nsimulation with a stratosphere-resolving model and the ERA5 reanalysis to\ncompare various aspects of the wave activity definition with common SSWs\nover the Arctic. About half of the wave events are identical to common SSWs.\nHowever, there exist several advantages for defining stratospheric weak\nextremes based on wave events rather than using the common SSW definition:\nthe wave activity flux definition captures with one criterion a variety of\ndifferent event types, detects strong SSWs and strong final warming events,\navoids weak SSWs that have little surface impact, and potentially lengthens\nthe prediction horizon of the surface response. We therefore conclude that\nthe wave driving represents a useful early indicator for stratospheric polar\nvortex events, which exploits the stratospheric potential for creating\npredictable surface signals better than common SSWs.\n","PeriodicalId":383272,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Climate Dynamics","volume":"29 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Climate Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-659-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Abstract. Natural variations in the strength of the northern
stratospheric polar vortex, so-called polar vortex events, help to improve
subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predictions of winter climate. Past research
on polar vortex events has been largely focused on sudden stratospheric
warming events (SSWs), a class of relatively strong weakenings of the polar
vortex. Commonly, SSWs are defined when the polar vortex reverses its
climatological wintertime westerly wind direction. In this study, however,
we use an alternative definition, based on the weighted time-integrated
upward wave activity flux at the lower stratosphere. We use a long control
simulation with a stratosphere-resolving model and the ERA5 reanalysis to
compare various aspects of the wave activity definition with common SSWs
over the Arctic. About half of the wave events are identical to common SSWs.
However, there exist several advantages for defining stratospheric weak
extremes based on wave events rather than using the common SSW definition:
the wave activity flux definition captures with one criterion a variety of
different event types, detects strong SSWs and strong final warming events,
avoids weak SSWs that have little surface impact, and potentially lengthens
the prediction horizon of the surface response. We therefore conclude that
the wave driving represents a useful early indicator for stratospheric polar
vortex events, which exploits the stratospheric potential for creating
predictable surface signals better than common SSWs.