Relational agency and epistemic justice in initial child protection conferences

J. Koprowska
{"title":"Relational agency and epistemic justice in initial child protection conferences","authors":"J. Koprowska","doi":"10.2307/J.CTV1GBRW72.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter examines Initial Child Protection Conferences in two local authorities in England, focusing principally on the role of the chair. It applies the concepts of institutional talk, relational agency, and epistemic rights and (in)justice. It demonstrates that differences in the chair’s interactional approach is influenced more by institutional norms than personal style. Its key finding is that relational agency and epistemic justice work together to advance service user participation.","PeriodicalId":356064,"journal":{"name":"Interprofessional Collaboration and Service Users","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interprofessional Collaboration and Service Users","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/J.CTV1GBRW72.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The chapter examines Initial Child Protection Conferences in two local authorities in England, focusing principally on the role of the chair. It applies the concepts of institutional talk, relational agency, and epistemic rights and (in)justice. It demonstrates that differences in the chair’s interactional approach is influenced more by institutional norms than personal style. Its key finding is that relational agency and epistemic justice work together to advance service user participation.
初次儿童保护会议的关系代理与认知正义
本章考察了英格兰两个地方当局的首次儿童保护会议,主要侧重于主席的作用。它应用了制度对话、关系代理、认知权利和正义的概念。它表明,主席互动方式的差异更多地受到制度规范的影响,而不是个人风格。它的主要发现是关系代理和认知正义共同促进服务用户参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信