Kings Yao and Shun as Understood in Daesoon Thought

Eun-hui Lee, Gyung-won Lee
{"title":"Kings Yao and Shun as Understood in Daesoon Thought","authors":"Eun-hui Lee, Gyung-won Lee","doi":"10.25050/JDAOS.2018.31.0.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"These days, the world finds itself in a time when 21st century human and societal practices can benefit from alternative viable models; as such models are desperately needed. Daesoon Jinrihoe seeks to show one model inspired by the historical kings, Yao and Shun. In Daesoon Jinrihoe, King Yao and King Shun (堯舜 yo sun) are recollected and projected into modern times. This paper is a study that examines what aspects of Daesoon Thought go into understanding Kings Yao and Shun and what insights their example can provide for modern people today. In Daesoon Thought, the ‘Dao of Kings Yao and Shun’ has appeared again because the ‘Era of the Great Opening (開闢時代 gaebyeok shidae)’ has arrived, and this era is characterized by ‘Seeking Out the Beginning and Returning to the Original Root (原始返本 wonshi banbon).’ This is not simply a return to ancient times. The seeds that fall on the ground grow up to overcome winds and rains, bring forth new fruits in the autumn, and their fruits contain the original seeds. The seeds are simultaneously the original * 제1저자. 대진대학교 박사수료, E-mail: hhaha88@hanmail.net ** 교신저자. 대진대학교 교수, E-mail: leegw@daejin.ac.kr 94 대순사상논총 제31집 / 연구논문 seeds, but not the seeds themselves. Rather, they are complete bodies condensed and infused with abundant experience gained after multitudinous trials. In Daesoon Thought, Kings Yao and Shun are analyzed from the following four perspectives: first, as an ideal human image that combines the qualities of Sages and Heroes (聖雄 seong oong), second, as the historical background behind the truth of the ‘Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence (解冤相生),’ third, as an ancient model of the ideal world, and fourth, as Daesoon Jinrihoe’s ‘Mind Dharma (心法)’ and also as the classical basis for the ‘Cultivation of Dao (修道).’ However, the meaning of Kings Yao and Shun in Daesoon Thought is not limited to traditional philosophical thought but also contains certain crucial differences. In Daesoon Thought, the qualities of sages and heroes are combined in a way that does not compromise or penalize, but in accordance with the rule of law and beyond, the ideal world is understood as a world in which there are no natural disasters and everyone enjoys beauty and splendor. Mind Dharma means the spiritual cultivation of the ‘Dao of Mutual Beneficence’ as presented by Sangje (上帝 the Supreme God) through sincerity, respectfulness, and faithfulness (誠敬信 seong, gyeong, shin). In addition, through the core truth of Daesoon Thought, the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence, the resolution of the grudges associated with Kings Yao and Shun will likewise eliminate the root-grudge plaguing humanity and divine beings. In this paper, I intend to deepen my understanding of Daesoon Thought through a study on our theology’s understanding of Kings Yao and Shun, and I also wish to redefine the value of Daesoon Thought through the symbolization and reinterpretation of ancient historical figures.","PeriodicalId":115590,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25050/JDAOS.2018.31.0.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

These days, the world finds itself in a time when 21st century human and societal practices can benefit from alternative viable models; as such models are desperately needed. Daesoon Jinrihoe seeks to show one model inspired by the historical kings, Yao and Shun. In Daesoon Jinrihoe, King Yao and King Shun (堯舜 yo sun) are recollected and projected into modern times. This paper is a study that examines what aspects of Daesoon Thought go into understanding Kings Yao and Shun and what insights their example can provide for modern people today. In Daesoon Thought, the ‘Dao of Kings Yao and Shun’ has appeared again because the ‘Era of the Great Opening (開闢時代 gaebyeok shidae)’ has arrived, and this era is characterized by ‘Seeking Out the Beginning and Returning to the Original Root (原始返本 wonshi banbon).’ This is not simply a return to ancient times. The seeds that fall on the ground grow up to overcome winds and rains, bring forth new fruits in the autumn, and their fruits contain the original seeds. The seeds are simultaneously the original * 제1저자. 대진대학교 박사수료, E-mail: hhaha88@hanmail.net ** 교신저자. 대진대학교 교수, E-mail: leegw@daejin.ac.kr 94 대순사상논총 제31집 / 연구논문 seeds, but not the seeds themselves. Rather, they are complete bodies condensed and infused with abundant experience gained after multitudinous trials. In Daesoon Thought, Kings Yao and Shun are analyzed from the following four perspectives: first, as an ideal human image that combines the qualities of Sages and Heroes (聖雄 seong oong), second, as the historical background behind the truth of the ‘Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence (解冤相生),’ third, as an ancient model of the ideal world, and fourth, as Daesoon Jinrihoe’s ‘Mind Dharma (心法)’ and also as the classical basis for the ‘Cultivation of Dao (修道).’ However, the meaning of Kings Yao and Shun in Daesoon Thought is not limited to traditional philosophical thought but also contains certain crucial differences. In Daesoon Thought, the qualities of sages and heroes are combined in a way that does not compromise or penalize, but in accordance with the rule of law and beyond, the ideal world is understood as a world in which there are no natural disasters and everyone enjoys beauty and splendor. Mind Dharma means the spiritual cultivation of the ‘Dao of Mutual Beneficence’ as presented by Sangje (上帝 the Supreme God) through sincerity, respectfulness, and faithfulness (誠敬信 seong, gyeong, shin). In addition, through the core truth of Daesoon Thought, the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence, the resolution of the grudges associated with Kings Yao and Shun will likewise eliminate the root-grudge plaguing humanity and divine beings. In this paper, I intend to deepen my understanding of Daesoon Thought through a study on our theology’s understanding of Kings Yao and Shun, and I also wish to redefine the value of Daesoon Thought through the symbolization and reinterpretation of ancient historical figures.
从大宣思想看尧、舜两王
如今,世界正处于这样一个时代:21世纪的人类和社会实践可以从其他可行的模式中受益;因为这样的模型是迫切需要的。《大宣真日会》试图展示一种模式,灵感来自历史上的国王尧和舜。在《大舜真日会》中,尧王和舜王(sun)被回忆并投射到现代。本文是一项研究,探讨了大舜思想的哪些方面可以用来理解尧、舜两王,以及他们的榜样可以为今天的现代人提供哪些启示。在《大舜思想》中,由于“大开放时代”的到来,“尧、舜之道”再次出现,这个时代的特点是“寻始归根”。这不是简单地回到古代。落在地上的种子会长大,克服风雨,在秋天结出新的果实,它们的果实中含有原来的种子。种子同时是原来的* * 1 * *。** ** ** ** ** ** ** *대진대학교교수,电子邮件:leegw@daejin.ac.kr 94대순사상논총제31집/연구논문种子,但种子本身。相反,他们是完整的身体,凝聚并注入了经过多次试验获得的丰富经验。Daesoon认为,国王尧和舜从以下四个角度进行了分析:首先,是一种理想的人类形象,结合了圣人和英雄的品质(聖雄seong oong),其次,作为背后的历史背景的真理的决议不满的相互善行(解冤相生),“第三,作为一个古老的理想世界的模型,和第四,Daesoon Jinrihoe的心中佛法(心法)”也随着古典基础培养的刀(修道)。然而,大宣思想中尧、舜两王的意义并不局限于传统的哲学思想,也包含着某些关键性的差异。在《大玄思想》中,以不妥协、不惩罚的方式将圣贤和英雄的品质结合在一起,但根据法治及超越法治的原则,将理想世界理解为没有自然灾害、人人享有美丽和辉煌的世界。介意佛法意味着精神的培养提出的“共同善行的刀”Sangje(上最高神帝)通过真诚、respectfulness,信实(誠敬信seong, gyeong, shin)。此外,通过大宣思想的核心真理“解恩济义”,解决与尧、舜两王有关的恩怨,同样也将消除困扰人类和神灵的根源恩怨。在本文中,我打算通过研究我国神学对尧、舜两王的理解来加深我对舜思想的理解,并希望通过对古代历史人物的符号化和重新诠释来重新定义舜思想的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信