J. Palomares-Salas, J. D. L. de la Rosa, J. Ramiro, J. Melgar, A. Aguera, A. Moreno
{"title":"ARIMA vs. Neural networks for wind speed forecasting","authors":"J. Palomares-Salas, J. D. L. de la Rosa, J. Ramiro, J. Melgar, A. Aguera, A. Moreno","doi":"10.1109/CIMSA.2009.5069932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper an ARIMA model is used for time-series forecast involving wind speed measurements. Results are compared with the performance of a back propagation type NNT. Results show that ARIMA model is better than NNT for short time-intervals to forecast (10 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours and 4 hours). Data was acquired from a unit located in Southern Andalusia (Peñaflor, Sevilla), with a soft orography (10 minutes between measurements). This feature is which makes performance of the ARIMA model and the NNT very similar, so a simple forecasting model could be used in order to administrate energy sources. The paper presents the process of model validation, along with a regression analysis, based in real-life data.","PeriodicalId":178669,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"81","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMSA.2009.5069932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81
Abstract
In this paper an ARIMA model is used for time-series forecast involving wind speed measurements. Results are compared with the performance of a back propagation type NNT. Results show that ARIMA model is better than NNT for short time-intervals to forecast (10 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours and 4 hours). Data was acquired from a unit located in Southern Andalusia (Peñaflor, Sevilla), with a soft orography (10 minutes between measurements). This feature is which makes performance of the ARIMA model and the NNT very similar, so a simple forecasting model could be used in order to administrate energy sources. The paper presents the process of model validation, along with a regression analysis, based in real-life data.