ARIMA vs. Neural networks for wind speed forecasting

J. Palomares-Salas, J. D. L. de la Rosa, J. Ramiro, J. Melgar, A. Aguera, A. Moreno
{"title":"ARIMA vs. Neural networks for wind speed forecasting","authors":"J. Palomares-Salas, J. D. L. de la Rosa, J. Ramiro, J. Melgar, A. Aguera, A. Moreno","doi":"10.1109/CIMSA.2009.5069932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper an ARIMA model is used for time-series forecast involving wind speed measurements. Results are compared with the performance of a back propagation type NNT. Results show that ARIMA model is better than NNT for short time-intervals to forecast (10 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours and 4 hours). Data was acquired from a unit located in Southern Andalusia (Peñaflor, Sevilla), with a soft orography (10 minutes between measurements). This feature is which makes performance of the ARIMA model and the NNT very similar, so a simple forecasting model could be used in order to administrate energy sources. The paper presents the process of model validation, along with a regression analysis, based in real-life data.","PeriodicalId":178669,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"81","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMSA.2009.5069932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81

Abstract

In this paper an ARIMA model is used for time-series forecast involving wind speed measurements. Results are compared with the performance of a back propagation type NNT. Results show that ARIMA model is better than NNT for short time-intervals to forecast (10 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours and 4 hours). Data was acquired from a unit located in Southern Andalusia (Peñaflor, Sevilla), with a soft orography (10 minutes between measurements). This feature is which makes performance of the ARIMA model and the NNT very similar, so a simple forecasting model could be used in order to administrate energy sources. The paper presents the process of model validation, along with a regression analysis, based in real-life data.
ARIMA与神经网络风速预报
本文将ARIMA模型用于风速测量的时间序列预报。结果与反向传播型NNT的性能进行了比较。结果表明,ARIMA模型在短时间间隔(10分钟、1小时、2小时和4小时)的预报效果优于NNT模型。数据来自位于安达卢西亚南部(Peñaflor,塞维利亚)的一个装置,具有软地形(测量间隔10分钟)。这一特征使得ARIMA模型和NNT的性能非常相似,因此可以使用一个简单的预测模型来管理能源。本文介绍了模型验证的过程,以及基于实际数据的回归分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信