THE NECESSITY OF TEAMWORK APPROACH IN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN EDUCATION: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY

Navid Khaleghimoghaddam
{"title":"THE NECESSITY OF TEAMWORK APPROACH IN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN EDUCATION: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY","authors":"Navid Khaleghimoghaddam","doi":"10.17365/tmd.2023.turkey.29.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study intends to identify the processes of group design with students, the weak and strong areas of their activity in different phases, and to assess the implications of education in executing this activity by focusing on the principles of group design thinking in architecture. Method: A test was conducted among students from Tehran and Konya Technical Universities to investigate the influence of education on improving group design quality. This experiment was conducted by having three-hour drawing sessions and dividing the students into 8 groups. The single-variable test method was utilized because of the independence of the groups and the equality of their variances. Two preliminary exams were used to measure students’ lack of understanding and familiarity with group work, followed by an extra examination for the students involved in the issue. Results: The findings revealed that in group architectural design, group members focus largely on the design’s content, with team communication centred on two essential aspects: content analysis and process review. Conclusion: Teamwork in designing can be superior to solo effort, and proper training can increase this. It is felt that paying attention to the concept of group design and teaching it in architecture schools is useful.","PeriodicalId":142407,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL REFEREED JOURNAL OF DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL REFEREED JOURNAL OF DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17365/tmd.2023.turkey.29.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study intends to identify the processes of group design with students, the weak and strong areas of their activity in different phases, and to assess the implications of education in executing this activity by focusing on the principles of group design thinking in architecture. Method: A test was conducted among students from Tehran and Konya Technical Universities to investigate the influence of education on improving group design quality. This experiment was conducted by having three-hour drawing sessions and dividing the students into 8 groups. The single-variable test method was utilized because of the independence of the groups and the equality of their variances. Two preliminary exams were used to measure students’ lack of understanding and familiarity with group work, followed by an extra examination for the students involved in the issue. Results: The findings revealed that in group architectural design, group members focus largely on the design’s content, with team communication centred on two essential aspects: content analysis and process review. Conclusion: Teamwork in designing can be superior to solo effort, and proper training can increase this. It is felt that paying attention to the concept of group design and teaching it in architecture schools is useful.
团队合作教学在建筑设计教学中的必要性分析研究
目的:本研究旨在识别学生群体设计的过程,他们在不同阶段的活动的弱项和强项,并通过关注建筑群体设计思维的原则来评估教育在执行这一活动中的意义。方法:以德黑兰理工大学和科尼亚理工大学学生为调查对象,探讨教育对提高群体设计质量的影响。这个实验是通过三个小时的绘画课,把学生分成8组来进行的。由于各组的独立性和方差相等,采用单变量检验方法。通过两次初步测试来衡量学生对小组作业的理解和熟悉程度,然后对参与问题的学生进行额外的测试。结果:研究结果表明,在群体建筑设计中,团队成员主要关注设计的内容,团队沟通主要集中在两个基本方面:内容分析和过程审查。结论:团队合作在设计中优于单打独斗,适当的训练可以提高团队合作的效果。人们认为,在建筑学校中关注群体设计的概念并教授它是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信