3 Old Concepts in Changing Societies? Continuities and Transformation of Nationalism in East Germany, 1871–2019

S. Brajer, J. Schütz
{"title":"3 Old Concepts in Changing Societies? Continuities and Transformation of Nationalism in East Germany, 1871–2019","authors":"S. Brajer, J. Schütz","doi":"10.1515/9783110729290-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the fall of the Iron Curtain and the end of real existing socialism, it was common to discuss the end of nation states and the era of a transnational order to come. After a period of globalization and internationalization, nation states played only a minor role in processes of decision-making, economic integration as well as historical development in general. Referrals were repeatedly made to Europe, to name one example here, because the EU significantly represented this global trend. Thus, when Eric Hobsbawm (1917–2012) wrote a new prologue to the German edition of his famous book Nations and Nationalism since 1780 in 2005, he claimed that nations were disappearing, and that is the time for scientific research because exploring nationalism was possible as recently as the phenomenon had gone. This perception changed over a couple of years. Several states have renationalized and thus apparently interrupted this development. To describe this process, we only need to mention a few keywords: Brexit, “Make America great again,” or border control, and everyone already knows that nationalism is still a vivid political concept. Last but not least, the consequences of the coronavirus as a nightmare for a totally globalized economy led to the complete isolation of individual countries in the northern hemisphere within a few days. The economic and political consequences are not yet foreseeable – a re-nationalization of states cannot be excluded.","PeriodicalId":156833,"journal":{"name":"Nationalism in a Transnational Age","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nationalism in a Transnational Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110729290-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the fall of the Iron Curtain and the end of real existing socialism, it was common to discuss the end of nation states and the era of a transnational order to come. After a period of globalization and internationalization, nation states played only a minor role in processes of decision-making, economic integration as well as historical development in general. Referrals were repeatedly made to Europe, to name one example here, because the EU significantly represented this global trend. Thus, when Eric Hobsbawm (1917–2012) wrote a new prologue to the German edition of his famous book Nations and Nationalism since 1780 in 2005, he claimed that nations were disappearing, and that is the time for scientific research because exploring nationalism was possible as recently as the phenomenon had gone. This perception changed over a couple of years. Several states have renationalized and thus apparently interrupted this development. To describe this process, we only need to mention a few keywords: Brexit, “Make America great again,” or border control, and everyone already knows that nationalism is still a vivid political concept. Last but not least, the consequences of the coronavirus as a nightmare for a totally globalized economy led to the complete isolation of individual countries in the northern hemisphere within a few days. The economic and political consequences are not yet foreseeable – a re-nationalization of states cannot be excluded.
变化中的社会中的旧观念?1871-2019年东德民族主义的延续与转型
在铁幕倒塌和现实存在的社会主义结束之后,人们普遍讨论民族国家的终结和跨国秩序时代的到来。在经历了一段时期的全球化和国际化之后,民族国家在决策、经济一体化以及整个历史发展过程中只发挥了次要作用。这里举一个例子,人们一再提到欧洲,因为欧盟在很大程度上代表了这一全球趋势。因此,当埃里克·霍布斯鲍姆(1917-2012)在2005年为他的名著《1780年以来的民族与民族主义》的德文版撰写新的序言时,他声称民族正在消失,这是科学研究的时候,因为在这种现象消失的时候,探索民族主义是可能的。这种看法在几年后发生了变化。几个州已经重新国有化,因此显然中断了这一发展。要描述这个过程,我们只需要提到几个关键词:英国脱欧、“让美国再次伟大”或边境管制,每个人都已经知道,民族主义仍然是一个生动的政治概念。最后但并非最不重要的是,冠状病毒对完全全球化的经济来说是一场噩梦,其后果导致北半球个别国家在几天内被完全隔离。其经济和政治后果尚无法预见-不能排除国家重新国有化的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信