Inequity in International Climate Change Negotiations

Serge Silatsa Nanda, O. Samba, Ahmad Sahide
{"title":"Inequity in International Climate Change Negotiations","authors":"Serge Silatsa Nanda, O. Samba, Ahmad Sahide","doi":"10.24076/nsjis.v4i2.444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of international climate agreements requires thorough negotiation between parties. This study aims to analyse the inequities between developed and developing countries in climate negotiations. This was done through a scrutiny of the main stages of these negotiations from the Rio Conference to the advent of the Paris Agreement. Our analysis has shown pervasive inequities along the climate negotiations over time. The UNFCCC made a qualitative separation between developed and developing countries in the principle of common but differentiated responsibility. Furthermore, the Kyoto Protocol emphasized this with the commitment of developed countries to reducing their greenhouse gas emissions by at least 5%. The Kyoto Protocol by introducing flexibility mechanisms such as the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) contributed to increase inequalities. The Paris Agreement has increased inequity by requesting each country to submit nationally determined contributions (NDCs) even though the global emission of developing countries remains very low. The negotiation style of developing countries is mostly limited to compromise and accommodation to the desires of the powerful states, as is the case in most international cooperation. The reality of the climate change negotiations mirrors the inequalities between developed and developing nations.","PeriodicalId":252813,"journal":{"name":"Nation State: Journal of International Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nation State: Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24076/nsjis.v4i2.444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The adoption of international climate agreements requires thorough negotiation between parties. This study aims to analyse the inequities between developed and developing countries in climate negotiations. This was done through a scrutiny of the main stages of these negotiations from the Rio Conference to the advent of the Paris Agreement. Our analysis has shown pervasive inequities along the climate negotiations over time. The UNFCCC made a qualitative separation between developed and developing countries in the principle of common but differentiated responsibility. Furthermore, the Kyoto Protocol emphasized this with the commitment of developed countries to reducing their greenhouse gas emissions by at least 5%. The Kyoto Protocol by introducing flexibility mechanisms such as the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) contributed to increase inequalities. The Paris Agreement has increased inequity by requesting each country to submit nationally determined contributions (NDCs) even though the global emission of developing countries remains very low. The negotiation style of developing countries is mostly limited to compromise and accommodation to the desires of the powerful states, as is the case in most international cooperation. The reality of the climate change negotiations mirrors the inequalities between developed and developing nations.
国际气候变化谈判中的不平等
通过国际气候协议需要各方进行彻底的谈判。本研究旨在分析发达国家和发展中国家在气候谈判中的不平等。这是通过审查这些谈判的主要阶段来完成的,从里约会议到《巴黎协定》的出台。我们的分析显示,随着时间的推移,气候谈判中的不平等现象无处不在。《联合国气候变化框架公约》根据共同但有区别的责任原则,对发达国家和发展中国家进行了质的区分。此外,《京都议定书》强调了这一点,发达国家承诺减少至少5%的温室气体排放。《京都议定书》引入了清洁发展机制(CDM)等灵活机制,加剧了不平等。尽管发展中国家的全球排放量仍然很低,但《巴黎协定》要求每个国家提交国家自主贡献(NDCs),从而加剧了不平等。与大多数国际合作一样,发展中国家的谈判风格大多局限于对强国的愿望进行妥协和迁就。气候变化谈判的现实反映了发达国家和发展中国家之间的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信